Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, D.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, D.-K.
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, H. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:446-455.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Infant Sleeping Position and the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in California, 1997–2000

De-Kun Li1,, Diana B. Petitti2, Marian Willinger3, Robin McMahon1, Roxana Odouli1, Hong Vu1 and Howard J. Hoffman4

1 Division of Research, Kaiser Foundation Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
2 Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA.
3 Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Center for Research on Mothers and Children, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD.
4 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Program, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, MD.

To assess the association between infant sleeping position and risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in an ethnically diverse US population, the authors conducted a population-based case-control study in 11 counties in California from May 1997 through April 2000. The authors conducted in-person interviews with the mothers of 185 SIDS cases and 312 randomly selected race/ethnicity- and age-matched controls to collect information on sleeping positions. Infants who had last been put down to sleep in the prone or side position were at greater risk of SIDS than were infants who had last been put down on their backs (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5, 4.5) and AOR = 2.0 (95% CI: 1.2, 3.4) for the prone and side positions, respectively). The risk of SIDS was especially high for an unstable side position in which an infant was placed on its side and found prone (AOR = 8.7, 95% CI: 3.3, 22.7). Infants who were usually placed on their backs to sleep but had last been put down in the prone or side position (an unaccustomed position) had a significantly high risk of SIDS (AOR = 8.2 (95% CI: 2.6, 26.0) and AOR = 6.9 (95% CI: 2.3, 20.6) for the prone and side positions, respectively). Infants placed in an unaccustomed prone or side sleeping position had a higher risk of SIDS than infants who were always placed prone or on the side.

case-control studies; infant; sleep; sudden infant death

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
F. R. Hauck and K. O. Tanabe
International Trends in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Stabilization of Rates Requires Further Action
Pediatrics, September 1, 2008; 122(3): 660 - 666.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. Y. Moon, M. Kington, R. Oden, J. Iglesias, and F. R. Hauck
Physician Recommendations Regarding SIDS Risk Reduction: A National Survey of Pediatricians and Family Physicians
Clinical Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 46(9): 791 - 800.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
E A Mitchell
Recommendations for sudden infant death syndrome prevention: a discussion document
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 155 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. M. Ostfeld, H. Perl, L. Esposito, K. Hempstead, R. Hinnen, A. Sandler, P. G. Pearson, and T. Hegyi
Sleep Environment, Positional, Lifestyle, and Demographic Characteristics Associated With Bed Sharing in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Cases: A Population-Based Study
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 2051 - 2059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
C. E. Hunt and F. R. Hauck
Sudden infant death syndrome.
Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 20, 2006; 174(13): 1861 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
F. R. Hauck, O. O. Omojokun, and M. S. Siadaty
The Pacifier Debate: In Reply
Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): 1850 - 1853.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D.-K. Li, M. Willinger, D. B Petitti, R. Odouli, L. Liu, and H. J Hoffman
Use of a dummy (pacifier) during sleep and risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS): population based case-control study
BMJ, January 7, 2006; 332(7532): 18 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
The Changing Concept of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Diagnostic Coding Shifts, Controversies Regarding the Sleeping Environment, and New Variables to Consider in Reducing Risk
Pediatrics, November 1, 2005; 116(5): 1245 - 1255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
X. Ma, P. A. Buffler, M. Layefsky, M. B. Does, and P. Reynolds
Control Selection Strategies in Case-Control Studies of Childhood Diseases
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2004; 159(10): 915 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
R. L. Ariagno and M. Mirmiran
Back to Sleep for Preterm Infants to Reduce the Risk of SIDS
NeoReviews, November 1, 2003; 4(11): e305 - 307.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
D. R. Neuspiel
Inconsistency in "Back to Sleep" Position Increases SIDS Risk
AAP Grand Rounds, May 1, 2003; 9(5): 51 - 51.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.