Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macaluso, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macaluso, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:289-297.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Efficacy of the Female Condom as a Barrier to Semen During Intercourse

Maurizio Macaluso1,, M. Louise Lawson1, Glen Hortin2, Ann Duerr3, Karen R. Hammond4, Richard Blackwell4 and Amy Bloom3

1 Department of Epidemiology and International Health, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
2 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
3 Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

In 1996–1998, the authors measured prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in vaginal fluid to assess the frequency of female condom failure and to evaluate the association of self-reported failure with semen exposure. Women at low risk of sexually transmitted diseases (n = 210) were recruited in Birmingham, Alabama. They were trained to use the female condom, sample vaginal fluid before and after condom use, and complete forms to report problems during each use. Semen exposure was assessed by comparing pre- and postcoital PSA levels in vaginal fluid. A total of 175 women used 2,232 condoms. The rate of semen exposure ranged from 7% to 21% of condom uses, depending on the exposure criterion. Exposure was more likely (21–34%) and more intense (mean postcoital PSA, 24.7 ng/ml) if participants reported a mechanical problem versus other problems or no problems (exposure rate, 5–20% in both instances; mean postcoital PSA, 9.6 and 7.8 ng/ml, respectively). In logistic regression analyses for repeated measurements, user-reported problems accounted for less than 59% of the instances of semen exposure. The female condom prevented semen exposure in 79–93% of condom uses. Exposure was associated with user-reported problems but also occurred in their absence. Reported problems and semen exposure decreased with user experience.

contraceptive devices, female; follow-up studies; safety; sexually transmitted diseases

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CFHC, California Family Health Council; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; STD, sexually transmitted disease.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Partner Characteristics, Intensity of the Intercourse, and Semen Exposure During Use of the Female Condom
M. Louise Lawson, Maurizio Macaluso, Ann Duerr, Glen Hortin, Karen R. Hammond, Richard Blackwell, Lynn Artz, and Amy Bloom
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 282-288. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  

Invited Commentary: Condom Effectiveness—Will Prostate-specific Antigen Shed New Light on This Perplexing Problem?
Markus J. Steiner, Paul J. Feldblum, and Nancy Padian
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 298-300. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  

Macaluso et al. Respond to "Condom Effectiveness and Prostate-specific Antigen"
Maurizio Macaluso, M. Louise Lawson, Ann Duerr, and Glen Hortin
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 301-302. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Warner, D. R. Newman, M. L. Kamb, M. Fishbein, J. M. Douglas Jr, J. Zenilman, L. D'Anna, G. Bolan, J. Rogers, T. Peterman, et al.
Problems with Condom Use among Patients Attending Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics: Prevalence, Predictors, and Relation to Incident Gonorrhea and Chlamydia
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2008; 167(3): 341 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. B. Polis, K. Schaffer, K. Blanchard, A. Glasier, C. C. Harper, and D. A. Grimes
Advance Provision of Emergency Contraception for Pregnancy Prevention: A Meta-Analysis
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2007; 110(6): 1379 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Macaluso, R. Blackwell, D. J. Jamieson, A. Kulczycki, M. P. Chen, R. Akers, D.-j. Kim, and A. Duerr
Efficacy of the Male Latex Condom and of the Female Polyurethane Condom as Barriers to Semen during Intercourse: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2007; 166(1): 88 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Zaviacic and R. J. Ablin
THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AS A CRITERION FOR CONDOM EFFECTIVENESS
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 704 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. M. Hobbs, M. J. Steiner, P. J. Feldblum, and N. Padian
HOBBS ET AL. REPLY
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 706 - 706.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Macaluso, M. L. Lawson, and D. L. Warner
MACALUSO ET AL. REPLY
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 705 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
A M Minnis and N S Padian
Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions
Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2005; 81(3): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Warner, M. Macaluso, H. D. Austin, D. K. Kleinbaum, L. Artz, M. E. Fleenor, I. Brill, D. R. Newman, and E. W. Hook III
Application of the Case-Crossover Design to Reduce Unmeasured Confounding in Studies of Condom Effectiveness
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2005; 161(8): 765 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. R. Mann and C. S. Stine
RE: "INVITED COMMENTARY: CONDOM EFFECTIVENESS--WILL PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN SHED NEW LIGHT ON THIS PERPLEXING PROBLEM?"
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2003; 158(2): 193 - 193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. J. Steiner, P. J. Feldblum, and N. Padian
Invited Commentary: Condom Effectiveness--Will Prostate-specific Antigen Shed New Light on This Perplexing Problem?
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2003; 157(4): 298 - 300.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Macaluso, M. L. Lawson, A. Duerr, and G. Hortin
Macaluso et al. Respond to "Condom Effectiveness and Prostate-specific Antigen"
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2003; 157(4): 301 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.