Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:282-288.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS |
Partner Characteristics, Intensity of the Intercourse, and Semen Exposure During Use of the Female Condom
1 Department of Epidemiology and International Health, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
2 Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
3 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
The objective of this study was to assess how characteristics of the intercourse and the couple relate to semen exposure during use of the female condom. From 1996 to 1998, 210 women in Birmingham, Alabama, were trained to use the female condom and follow study procedures during a group session and individually practiced inserting the device. The outcome was semen exposure as defined by comparing pre- and postcoital prostate-specific antigen levels in vaginal fluid. Women who had high income levels had lower rates of semen exposure (odds ratio (OR) = 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2, 0.7), while those in a relationship of less than 2 years were at greater risk (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3, 4.1). Couples with a large disparity in vaginal fundus size and penis size were at increased risk of semen exposure (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2, 6.0). Engaging in very active intercourse also increased the risk (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.6). Thus, the protective effect of the female condom appears to be a function of user- and intercourse-specific characteristics. Future studies of male condom efficacy should focus on collecting detailed data about the users and characteristics of intercourse to predict failure accurately.
biological markers; coitus; condoms, female; contraception behavior; prostate-specific antigen; semen; sex behavior; sexually transmitted diseases
Abbreviations: Abbreviations: PSA, prostate-specific antigen; STD, sexually transmitted disease.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:
- Efficacy of the Female Condom as a Barrier to Semen During Intercourse
- Maurizio Macaluso, M. Louise Lawson, Glen Hortin, Ann Duerr, Karen R. Hammond, Richard Blackwell, and Amy Bloom
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 289-297.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text] - Invited Commentary: Condom EffectivenessWill Prostate-specific Antigen Shed New Light on This Perplexing Problem?
- Markus J. Steiner, Paul J. Feldblum, and Nancy Padian
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 298-300.[Extract] [FREE Full Text] - Macaluso et al. Respond to "Condom Effectiveness and Prostate-specific Antigen"
- Maurizio Macaluso, M. Louise Lawson, Ann Duerr, and Glen Hortin
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 301-302.[Extract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Macaluso, R. Blackwell, D. J. Jamieson, A. Kulczycki, M. P. Chen, R. Akers, D.-j. Kim, and A. Duerr Efficacy of the Male Latex Condom and of the Female Polyurethane Condom as Barriers to Semen during Intercourse: A Randomized Clinical Trial Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2007; 166(1): 88 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zaviacic and R. J. Ablin THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AS A CRITERION FOR CONDOM EFFECTIVENESS Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 704 - 705. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hobbs, M. J. Steiner, P. J. Feldblum, and N. Padian HOBBS ET AL. REPLY Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 706 - 706. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Macaluso, M. L. Lawson, and D. L. Warner MACALUSO ET AL. REPLY Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 705 - 705. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M Minnis and N S Padian Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions Sex Transm Inf, June 1, 2005; 81(3): 193 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Mann and C. S. Stine RE: "INVITED COMMENTARY: CONDOM EFFECTIVENESS--WILL PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN SHED NEW LIGHT ON THIS PERPLEXING PROBLEM?" Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2003; 158(2): 193 - 193. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Steiner, P. J. Feldblum, and N. Padian Invited Commentary: Condom Effectiveness--Will Prostate-specific Antigen Shed New Light on This Perplexing Problem? Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2003; 157(4): 298 - 300. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Macaluso, M. L. Lawson, A. Duerr, and G. Hortin Macaluso et al. Respond to "Condom Effectiveness and Prostate-specific Antigen" Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2003; 157(4): 301 - 302. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

