Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bloom, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:282-288.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Partner Characteristics, Intensity of the Intercourse, and Semen Exposure During Use of the Female Condom

M. Louise Lawson1,, Maurizio Macaluso1, Ann Duerr2, Glen Hortin3, Karen R. Hammond4, Richard Blackwell4, Lynn Artz1 and Amy Bloom2

1 Department of Epidemiology and International Health, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
2 Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
3 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

The objective of this study was to assess how characteristics of the intercourse and the couple relate to semen exposure during use of the female condom. From 1996 to 1998, 210 women in Birmingham, Alabama, were trained to use the female condom and follow study procedures during a group session and individually practiced inserting the device. The outcome was semen exposure as defined by comparing pre- and postcoital prostate-specific antigen levels in vaginal fluid. Women who had high income levels had lower rates of semen exposure (odds ratio (OR) = 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2, 0.7), while those in a relationship of less than 2 years were at greater risk (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.3, 4.1). Couples with a large disparity in vaginal fundus size and penis size were at increased risk of semen exposure (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2, 6.0). Engaging in very active intercourse also increased the risk (OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.6). Thus, the protective effect of the female condom appears to be a function of user- and intercourse-specific characteristics. Future studies of male condom efficacy should focus on collecting detailed data about the users and characteristics of intercourse to predict failure accurately.

biological markers; coitus; condoms, female; contraception behavior; prostate-specific antigen; semen; sex behavior; sexually transmitted diseases

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: PSA, prostate-specific antigen; STD, sexually transmitted disease.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Efficacy of the Female Condom as a Barrier to Semen During Intercourse
Maurizio Macaluso, M. Louise Lawson, Glen Hortin, Ann Duerr, Karen R. Hammond, Richard Blackwell, and Amy Bloom
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 289-297. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  

Invited Commentary: Condom Effectiveness—Will Prostate-specific Antigen Shed New Light on This Perplexing Problem?
Markus J. Steiner, Paul J. Feldblum, and Nancy Padian
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 298-300. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  

Macaluso et al. Respond to "Condom Effectiveness and Prostate-specific Antigen"
Maurizio Macaluso, M. Louise Lawson, Ann Duerr, and Glen Hortin
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 301-302. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Macaluso, R. Blackwell, D. J. Jamieson, A. Kulczycki, M. P. Chen, R. Akers, D.-j. Kim, and A. Duerr
Efficacy of the Male Latex Condom and of the Female Polyurethane Condom as Barriers to Semen during Intercourse: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2007; 166(1): 88 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Zaviacic and R. J. Ablin
THE USE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AS A CRITERION FOR CONDOM EFFECTIVENESS
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 704 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. M. Hobbs, M. J. Steiner, P. J. Feldblum, and N. Padian
HOBBS ET AL. REPLY
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 706 - 706.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Macaluso, M. L. Lawson, and D. L. Warner
MACALUSO ET AL. REPLY
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2005; 162(7): 705 - 705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
A M Minnis and N S Padian
Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions
Sex Transm Inf, June 1, 2005; 81(3): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. R. Mann and C. S. Stine
RE: "INVITED COMMENTARY: CONDOM EFFECTIVENESS--WILL PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN SHED NEW LIGHT ON THIS PERPLEXING PROBLEM?"
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2003; 158(2): 193 - 193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. J. Steiner, P. J. Feldblum, and N. Padian
Invited Commentary: Condom Effectiveness--Will Prostate-specific Antigen Shed New Light on This Perplexing Problem?
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2003; 157(4): 298 - 300.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Macaluso, M. L. Lawson, A. Duerr, and G. Hortin
Macaluso et al. Respond to "Condom Effectiveness and Prostate-specific Antigen"
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2003; 157(4): 301 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.