Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rachootin, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rachootin, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:94-97.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

COMMENTARIES

Invited Commentary: Monitoring Fecundity over Time—If We Do It, Then Let’s Do It Right

Jørn Olsen1, and Pamela Rachootin2

1 The Danish Epidemiology Science Centre, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
2 Southern Division of General Practice, Brighton, South Australia, Australia.

A number of investigators have pointed to the possibility of a secular decline in human fecundity due to changes in sperm concentration. It is unlikely that any historical trends will be definitively quantified, but a good case can be made for more precise monitoring of this phenomenon in the future. Such monitoring would be justified on the grounds of the importance of early detection of environmental effects on the capacity of humans to reproduce. Establishing a surveillance system that will be sensitive enough to detect changes in fecundity over time is, however, a challenging enterprise because of methodological concerns. It may be impossible to obtain a quality of design that will pick up subtle changes in fecundity.

data collection; fertility


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Invited Commentary: The Potential for Monitoring of Fecundity and the Remaining Challenges
Michael Joffe
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003 157: 89-93. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
R.M. Ferrari, M.A. Cooney, A. Vexler, A. Liu, and G.M. Buck Louis
Time to pregnancy and multiple births
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 407 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Joffe
Invited Commentary: The Potential for Monitoring of Fecundity and the Remaining Challenges
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2003; 157(2): 89 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.