Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steindorf, K.
Right arrow Articles by Chang-Claude, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steindorf, K.
Right arrow Articles by Chang-Claude, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:121-130.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Case-Control Study of Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Risk among Premenopausal Women in Germany

Karen Steindorf1,, Martina Schmidt1, Silke Kropp2 and Jenny Chang-Claude2

1 Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
2 Division of Clinical Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Important aspects of the recognized inverse relation between physical activity and breast cancer risk are still under discussion. Data on physical activity from sports, occupational activity, household tasks, walking, and cycling by reported frequency, duration, and intensity during adolescence and young adulthood were collected in 1999–2000 from 360 premenopausal breast cancer cases and 886 controls who had previously participated in a German population-based case-control study. In multivariate conditional logistic regression, no association between total physical activity and premenopausal breast cancer was found in two age periods. For women who were active during both periods, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.60, 1.14). When both age periods were combined, higher quartiles of total physical activity compared with the lowest quartile showed adjusted odds ratios of 0.97, 0.68, and 0.94. Only the effect of moderately high physical activity was statistically significant. Analyses by type of activity revealed significant protective effects for women who reported the highest levels of cycling activities (adjusted odds ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.45, 0.97). These data do not suggest an inverse monotonic association between total physical activity and breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. The study prevalence of cycling and walking for transportation demonstrated that national habits need consideration in the exposure assessment.

breast neoplasms; case-control studies; exercise; premenopause; questionnaires

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MET, metabolic equivalent; OR, odds ratio.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
C M Friedenreich and A E Cust
Physical activity and breast cancer risk: impact of timing, type and dose of activity and population subgroup effects
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2008; 42(8): 636 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. S. Maruti, W. C. Willett, D. Feskanich, B. Rosner, and G. A. Colditz
A Prospective Study of Age-Specific Physical Activity and Premenopausal Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 21, 2008; 100(10): 728 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. H. Lahmann, C. Friedenreich, A. J. Schuit, S. Salvini, N. E. Allen, T. J. Key, K.-T. Khaw, S. Bingham, P. H.M. Peeters, E. Monninkhof, et al.
Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Risk: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 36 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. Tehard, C. M. Friedenreich, J.-M. Oppert, and F. Clavel-Chapelon
Effect of Physical Activity on Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: Results from the E3N Cohort Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. Bernstein, A. V. Patel, G. Ursin, J. Sullivan-Halley, M. F. Press, D. Deapen, J. A. Berlin, J. R. Daling, J. A. McDonald, S. A. Norman, et al.
Lifetime Recreational Exercise Activity and Breast Cancer Risk Among Black Women and White Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 16, 2005; 97(22): 1671 - 1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. D. Holmes, W. Y. Chen, D. Feskanich, C. H. Kroenke, and G. A. Colditz
Physical Activity and Survival After Breast Cancer Diagnosis
JAMA, May 25, 2005; 293(20): 2479 - 2486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. M. John, P. L. Horn-Ross, and J. Koo
Lifetime Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Risk in a Multiethnic Population: The San Francisco Bay Area Breast Cancer Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2003; 12(11): 1143 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.