Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stellato, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stellato, R. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:676-683.
Copyright © 2002 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Assessment of Digit Preference in Self-reported Year at Menopause: Choice of an Appropriate Reference Distribution

Sybil L. Crawford1, Catherine B. Johannes2 and Rebecca K. Stellato3

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA.
2 Epidemiology Division, Ingenix Pharmaceutical Services, Newton Lower Falls, MA.
3 Laboratory of Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Estimated associations between self-reported age at menopause and health may be attenuated if self-report is inaccurate. In a cross-sectional study, it is not possible to assess validity or reproducibility. Instead, one can examine digit preference, e.g., overreporting of numbers ending in zero or five. Typically, analyses use equal proportions—10% probability for each digit—as the reference distribution. Depending on the age distribution of the sample and on the underlying distribution of age at the event, however, an alternative reference distribution may be more appropriate. As an illustration, the authors examined digit preference in the self-reported calendar year at the final menstrual period in cross-sectional data from 2,151 naturally postmenopausal women in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (1995–1997), a multisite, multiethnic study of women aged 40–55 years. With chi-square tests, the distribution of terminal digit for self-reported year at the final menstrual period was compared with several reference distributions. The observed distribution was much closer to a reference distribution based on previously published data than it was to equal proportions. Future assessments of digit preference in cross-sectional studies should consider alternatives to equal proportions, particularly for samples with small age ranges and events with a restricted underlying age distribution.

age of onset; menopause; recall

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: NIA, National Institute on Aging; SWAN, Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Statistical ModellingHome page
C. G. Camarda, P. H.C. Eilers, and J. Gampe
Modelling general patterns of digit preference
Statistical Modeling, December 1, 2008; 8(4): 385 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.