Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mølbak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Neimann, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mølbak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Neimann, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:654-661.
Copyright © 2002 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Risk Factors for Sporadic Infection with Salmonella Enteritidis, Denmark, 1997–1999

Kåre Mølbak1,2 and Jakob Neimann3

1 Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
2 Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Branch, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
3 Danish Zoonosis Center, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Copenhagen, Denmark.

In a prospective case-control study of sporadic Salmonella Enteritidis infection in Denmark (1997–1999), foreign travel was reported by 25% of 455 case patients and 8% of 507 controls (odds ratio (OR) = 3.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4, 5.5). Among nontravelers, 80% of 335 cases and 81% of 467 controls had consumed eggs or dishes containing raw or undercooked eggs during the week before disease onset or interview, while 35% of cases and 19% of controls had incurred this exposure the day before onset or interview (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.5, 3.1). Specific exposures included consumption of buttermilk dessert (OR = 11.7), homemade ice cream (OR = 4.3), raw eggs (OR = 3.4), and eggs fried "sunny side up" (OR = 2.5). Among persons who had used eggs in the week before disease onset or interview, eggs from battery laying hens were associated with disease (white eggs: OR = 2.4, brown eggs: OR = 1.9), whereas consumption of pasteurized eggs tended to be protective (OR = 0.3). The study confirmed that eggs are the principal source of S. Enteritidis in Denmark. This conclusion was reached through the use of an exposure time window that corresponds to the most relevant incubation period rather than the maximum incubation period. The authors recommend this method in studies that have the objective of determining risk associated with common exposures.

case-control studies; eggs; food poisoning; poultry; poultry products; risk factors; Salmonella Enteritidis

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PT, phage type.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. C. Noujaim, R. L. A. Filho, E. T. Lima, A. S. Okamoto, R. L. Amorim, and R. T. Neto
Detection of T Lymphocytes in Intestine of Broiler Chicks Treated with Lactobacillus spp. and Challenged with Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2008; 87(5): 927 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
R. L. Andreatti Filho, J. P. Higgins, S. E. Higgins, G. Gaona, A. D. Wolfenden, G. Tellez, and B. M. Hargis
Ability of Bacteriophages Isolated from Different Sources to Reduce Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis In Vitro and In Vivo
Poult. Sci., September 1, 2007; 86(9): 1904 - 1909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Ethelberg, K. E. P. Olsen, P. Gerner-Smidt, and K. Molbak
Household Outbreaks among Culture-confirmed Cases of Bacterial Gastrointestinal Disease
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2004; 159(4): 406 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.