Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Citing Articles
Right arrowScopus Links
Right arrowCiting Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertone, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertone, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2002; 156:268-273.
Copyright © 2002 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Risk of Malignant Lymphoma in Pet Cats

Elizabeth R. Bertone1,2, Laura A. Snyder3 and Antony S. Moore3

1 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
2 Department of Clinical Sciences, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA.
3 Harrington Oncology Program, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, MA.

Feline malignant lymphoma occurs commonly in domestic cats and may serve as a model for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in humans. Several studies have suggested that smoking may increase the risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. To evaluate whether exposure to household environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) may increase the risk of feline malignant lymphoma, the authors conducted a case-control study of this relation in 80 cats with malignant lymphoma and 114 controls with renal disease diagnosed at a large Massachusetts veterinary teaching hospital between 1993 and 2000. Owners of all subjects were sent a questionnaire inquiring about the level of smoking in the household 2 years prior to diagnosis. After adjustment for age and other factors, the relative risk of malignant lymphoma for cats with any household ETS exposure was 2.4 (95 percent confidence interval: 1.2, 4.5). Risk increased with both duration and quantity of exposure, with evidence of a linear trend. Cats with 5 or more years of ETS exposure had a relative risk of 3.2 (95 percent confidence interval: 1.5, 6.9; p for trend = 0.003) compared with those in nonsmoking households. These findings suggest that passive smoking may increase the risk of malignant lymphoma in cats and that further study of this relation in humans is warranted. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:268–73.

cat diseases; lymphoma; smoke; smoking; tobacco smoke pollution

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; TUSVM, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
S M Milberger, R M Davis, and A L Holm
Pet owners' attitudes and behaviours related to smoking and second-hand smoke: a pilot study
Tob. Control, April 1, 2009; 18(2): 156 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
M. Wilson
Integrative Tumor Board: Recurrent Lymphoma
Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2004; 3(3): 246 - 250.
[PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. W. E. Denson
RE: "ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE AND RISK OF MALIGNANT LYMPHOMA IN PET CATS"
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2003; 158(12): 1227 - 1227.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. R. Bertone-Johnson
THE FIRST AUTHOR REPLIES
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2003; 158(12): 1227 - 1228.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.