American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 155, No. 6 : 534-545
Copyright © 2002 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS |
Impact of Sociodemographic Factors, Hormone Receptor Status, and Tumor Grade on Ethnic Differences in Tumor Stage and Size for Breast Cancer in US Women
1 Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
2 Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
The importance of sociodemographic factors and tumor biomarkers in explaining ethnic differences in tumor stage and size at diagnosis was investigated in over 106,000 female breast cancer patients reported during 1992–1996 from 11 US population-based cancer registries. Japanese and non-Hispanic White women tended to be diagnosed at an earlier stage, with smaller diameter tumors and with a lower tumor grade than women from seven other ethnic groups. Statistical adjustment for individual- and group-level sociodemographic factors produced 50–80% reductions in the odds ratios for distant (vs. localized) stage and larger (vs. <1 cm) tumor size among Black women and Hispanic women. These factors also helped to account for tumor stage and size variation among most other ethnic groups. Consideration of hormone receptor status and tumor grade had little effect on the ethnic patterns. Although small, elevated odds ratios remained for some groups, our results suggest that sociodemographic factors accounted for many of the observed ethnic differences in breast cancer stage and tumor size at the time of diagnosis. Because most of the sociodemographic variables were aggregate measures, it is possible that residual confounding by socioeconomic position could explain the persistence of slightly elevated odds ratios in some ethnic groups.
breast neoplasms; case-control studies; ethnic groups; neoplasm staging; SEER Program; socioeconomic factors
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. M. E. Hahn, M. L. Bondy, M. Selvan, M. J. Lund, J. M. Liff, E. W. Flagg, L. A. Brinton, P. Porter, J. W. Eley, and R. J. Coates Factors Associated with Advanced Disease Stage at Diagnosis in a Population-based Study of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2007; 166(9): 1035 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. M. Lantz, M. Mujahid, K. Schwartz, N. K. Janz, A. Fagerlin, B. Salem, L. Liu, D. Deapen, and S. J. Katz The Influence of Race, Ethnicity, and Individual Socioeconomic Factors on Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Am J Public Health, December 1, 2006; 96(12): 2173 - 2178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Amend, D. Hicks, and C. B. Ambrosone Breast Cancer in African-American Women: Differences in Tumor Biology from European-American Women. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8327 - 8330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M. Woods, B. Rachet, and M. P. Coleman Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review Ann. Onc., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 5 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. C. Benz, C. A. Clarke, and D. H. Moore II Geographic Excess of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2003; 12(12): 1523 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|