Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stearns, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glaser, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Stearns, C. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 155, No. 10 : 972-975
Copyright © 2002 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Reliability of Random Digit Dialing Calls to Enumerate an Adult Female Population

Sally L. Glaser and Cynthia B. Stearns

From the Northern California Cancer Center, Union City, CA.

Challenges to random digit dialing have been documented, but the reliability of random digit dialing outcomes from telephone number calling, household identification, and enumeration has never been addressed, despite its potential to bias population representativeness by affecting completeness of coverage. The authors explored interobserver reliability of calls to numbers generated by random digit dialing for a 1990–1996 population-based case-control study in San Francisco, California, area women, using data from a quality control effort in which 122 of 4,890 random digit dialing numbers were assigned to a second interviewer for recontacting within 4 months. The 34 numbers discrepant between the first and second calls did not differ from the 88 unchanged outcomes, and reliability was good (kappa = 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.55, 0.75). Eligibility (an adult woman in the household) was confirmed for nine of 11 eligible households. However, six of 29 households originally ineligible because of gender were eligible on recontact, and eligible residences rose from 24% to 39% between the two calls, although the two groups of eligible women did not differ in age or race. This underenumeration of women by random digit dialing confirms prior observations, although interviewer differences or changes in respondents or household composition between the first and second calls may have contributed. Recontact of gender-ineligible households may improve completeness of random digit dialing coverage for female populations.

epidemiologic methods; random digit dialing; reliability


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Glaser, C. A. Clarke, R. A. Nugent, C. B. Stearns, and R. F. Dorfman
Reproductive Factors in Hodgkin's Disease in Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2003; 158(6): 553 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.