Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mizoue, T.
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mizoue, T.
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 9 : 803-808
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Overtime Work as Risk Factors for Sick Building Syndrome in Japan

Tetsuya Mizoue1, Kari Reijula2 and Kjell Andersson3

1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.
2 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
3 Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Örebro Medical Center Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.

Sick building syndrome (SBS) is an increasingly common health problem for workers in modern office buildings. It is characterized by irritation of mucous membranes and the skin and general malaise. The impact of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure and overtime work on these symptoms remains unclear. The authors examined these relations using data from a 1998 cross-sectional survey of 1,281 municipal employees who worked in a variety of buildings in a Japanese city. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio for symptoms typical of SBS while adjusting for potential confounders. Among nonsmokers, the odds ratio for the association between study-defined SBS and 4 hours of ETS exposure per day was 2.7 (95% confidence interval: 1.6, 4.8), and for most symptom categories, odds ratios increased with increasing hours of ETS exposure. Working overtime for 30 or more hours per month was also associated with SBS symptoms, but the crude odds ratio of 3.0 for SBS (95% confidence interval: 1.8, 5.0) was reduced by 21% after adjustment for variables associated with overtime work and by 49% after further adjustment for perceived work overload. These results suggest that both ETS exposure and extensive amounts of overtime work contribute to the development of SBS symptoms and that the association between overtime and SBS can be explained substantially by the work environment and personal lifestyle correlated with overtime.

cross-sectional studies; occupational exposure; overtime; sick building syndrome; tobacco smoke pollution; workload

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ETS, environmental tobacco smoke; OR, odds ratio; SBS, sick building syndrome


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
A F Marmot, J Eley, M Stafford, S A Stansfeld, E Warwick, and M G Marmot
Building health: an epidemiological study of "sick building syndrome" in the Whitehall II study.
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2006; 63(4): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
P S Burge
Sick building syndrome
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2004; 61(2): 185 - 190.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
D. M. Kuhn and M. A. Ghannoum
Indoor Mold, Toxigenic Fungi, and Stachybotrys chartarum: Infectious Disease Perspective
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2003; 16(1): 144 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.