Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by England, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Zahniser, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by England, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Zahniser, S. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 8 : 694-701
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Effects of Smoking Reduction during Pregnancy on the Birth Weight of Term Infants

Lucinda J. England1,2, Juliette S. Kendrick2, Hoyt G. Wilson3, Robert K. Merritt4, Paul M. Gargiullo5 and S. Christine Zahniser6

1 Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemiology Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
2 Pregnancy and Infant Health Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
3 Statistics and Computer Resources Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
4 Program Services and Development Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
5 Childhood Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Epidemiology and Surveillance Division, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
6 Training, Development, and Management Activity, Division of Applied Public Health Training, Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

This study was undertaken to determine 1) whether reducing tobacco exposure during pregnancy increases the birth weight of term infants and 2) the relative effects of early- and late-pregnancy exposure to tobacco on infant birth weight. Data were obtained from the Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy project, conducted in public clinics in three states (Colorado, Maryland, and Missouri) between 1987 and 1991. Self-reported cigarette use and urine cotinine concentration were collected from 1,583 pregnant smokers at study enrollment and in the third trimester. General linear models were used to generate mean adjusted birth weights for women who reduced their tobacco exposure by 50 percent or more and for those who did not change their exposure. Regression smoothing techniques were used to characterize the relation between birth weight and early exposure and birth weight and third-trimester exposure. Reducing cigarette use was associated with an increase in mean adjusted birth weight of only 32 g, which was not significant (p = 0.33). As third-trimester cigarette use increased, birth weight declined sharply but leveled off at more than eight cigarettes per day. Findings were similar when urine cotinine concentration was used. Women who smoke during pregnancy may need to reduce to low levels of exposure (less than eight cigarettes per day) to improve infant birth weight.

birth weight; cotinine; nicotine; pregnancy; smoking; tobacco


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. A.E. El-Mohandes, M. Kiely, M. G. Gantz, S. M. Blake, and M. N. El-Khorazaty
Prediction of Birth Weight By Cotinine Levels During Pregnancy in a Population of Black Smokers
Pediatrics, October 1, 2009; 124(4): e671 - e680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Detmar, M. Y. Rennie, K. J. Whiteley, D. Qu, Y. Taniuchi, X. Shang, R. F. Casper, S. L. Adamson, J. G. Sled, and A. Jurisicova
Fetal growth restriction triggered by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is associated with altered placental vasculature and AhR-dependent changes in cell death
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2008; 295(2): E519 - E530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Sasaki, F. Sata, S. Katoh, Y. Saijo, S. Nakajima, N. Washino, K. Konishi, S. Ban, M. Ishizuka, and R. Kishi
Adverse Birth Outcomes Associated with Maternal Smoking and Polymorphisms in the N-Nitrosamine-Metabolizing Enzyme Genes NQO1 and CYP2E1
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2008; 167(6): 719 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. Sasaki, T. Kondo, F. Sata, Y. Saijo, S. Katoh, S. Nakajima, M. Ishizuka, S. Fujita, and R. Kishi
Maternal smoking during pregnancy and genetic polymorphisms in the Ah receptor, CYP1A1 and GSTM1 affect infant birth size in Japanese subjects
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 12(2): 77 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
B P Lanphear and C F Bearer
Biomarkers in paediatric research and practice
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 594 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pediatr. Rev.Home page
B. P. Lanphear, R. O. Wright, and K. N. Dietrich
Environmental Neurotoxins
Pediatr. Rev., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 191 - 198.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. J. England, J. S. Kendrick, and P. M. Gargiullo
THE AUTHORS REPLY
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2003; 157(1): 87 - 88.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.