Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loomis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Butts, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loomis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Butts, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 5 : 410-417
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Homicide on the Job: Workplace and Community Determinants

Dana Loomis1,2, Susanne H. Wolf1,2, Carol W. Runyan2,3, Stephen W. Marshall1,2 and John D. Butts2,4

1 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
2 University of North Carolina Injury Prevention Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC.
3 Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
4 Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Chapel Hill, NC.

Homicide is the second leading cause of death on the job for workers in the United States. To identify workplace-level predictors of homicide risk, a case-control study of worker killings in North Carolina in 1994–1998 was conducted. Workplaces were the units of analysis: case workplaces (n = 105) were those where a worker was killed during the study period, while controls (n = 210) were a density sample of North Carolina workplaces, matched on time and industry sector. Potential risk and protective factors were assessed in telephone interviews with workplace managers. Associations were measured by the exposure odds ratio and 95% confidence interval, estimated via conditional logistic regression. Characteristics associated with notably higher risk included being at the current location for 2 years or less (odds ratio (OR) = 5.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2, 12.6), having only one worker (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 7.2), and having night (OR = 4.9, 95% CI: 2.7, 8.8) or Saturday (OR = 4.2, 95% CI: 1.9, 9.2) hours. Workplaces with only male employees (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.5, 6.5) or with African-American or Asian employees were also more likely to experience a killing. While few of the preceding risk factors are directly modifiable through workplace interventions, it is important to identify them before developing or evaluating preventive measures.

homicide; occupational exposure; occupational health; violence; work

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI confidence interval


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. W. Runyan, M. Schulman, J. Dal Santo, J. M. Bowling, R. Agans, and M. Ta
Work-Related Hazards and Workplace Safety of US Adolescents Employed in the Retail and Service Sectors
Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 526 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
C. Peek-Asa, C. Casteel, J. F. Kraus, and P. Whitten
Employee and Customer Injury During Violent Crimes in Retail and Service Businesses
Am J Public Health, October 1, 2006; 96(10): 1867 - 1872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. H. Tanne
US workers who carry guns are more likely to be killed on the job
BMJ, May 7, 2005; 330(7499): 1043 - 1043.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
D. Loomis, S. W. Marshall, and M. L. Ta
Employer Policies Toward Guns and the Risk of Homicide in the Workplace
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2005; 95(5): 830 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. Loomis, S. W. Marshall, S. H. Wolf, C. W. Runyan, and J. D. Butts
Effectiveness of Safety Measures Recommended for Prevention of Workplace Homicide
JAMA, February 27, 2002; 287(8): 1011 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.