Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adams, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adams, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 10 : 883-888
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Validity of Birth Certificate Data for the Outcome of the Previous Pregnancy, Georgia, 1980–1995

Melissa Adams

From the World Health Organization Collaborating Center in Perinatal Care and Health Services Research in Maternal Child Health, Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

The author evaluated the validity of four historically based variables collected on Georgia birth certificates: outcome of preceding pregnancy, history of delivery of a low- (<2,500 g) or high- (>4,000 g) birth-weight infant, and death of the baby resulting from the preceding pregnancy. Data were derived from birth and fetal death certificates that were linked for the first and second deliveries of 231,075 women in Georgia from 1980 through 1995. Deaths that occurred during the infant's first year of life were also linked to the birth certificate. For all but the survival variable, the outcome of the first birth as reported on the certificate for the second birth was compared with the outcome recorded on the certificate for the first birth, which was assumed to be correct. Except for ascertainment of death of the firstborn infant, sensitivities for the history of poor outcomes were low. Furthermore, sensitivities were higher when an extremely adverse outcome occurred in the first pregnancy or an adverse outcome recurred. The only high sensitivity was for past infant death (85.4%). These results suggest caution when using these variables to identify high-risk subsets for further research or control for confounding.

birth certificates; sensitivity; specificity

Abbreviations: HBW, high birth weight (>4,000 g); LBW, low birth weight (<2,500 g); PVN, predictive value negative; PVP, predictive value positive; RR, relative risk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. Luke and M. B. Brown
The Changing Risk of Infant Mortality by Gestation, Plurality, and Race: 1989-1991 Versus 1999-2001
Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): 2488 - 2497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Gilbreath and P. H. Kass
Adverse Birth Outcomes Associated with Open Dumpsites in Alaska Native Villages
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2006; 164(6): 518 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
B. K. Finch
The Starting Gate: Birth Weight and Life Chances
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2005; 30(6): 1178 - 1182.
[PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. R. Petrini, W. M. Callaghan, M. Klebanoff, N. S. Green, E. M. Lackritz, J. L. Howse, R. H. Schwarz, and K. Damus
Estimated Effect of 17 Alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate on Preterm Birth in the United States
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2005; 105(2): 267 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. S. Kirby
Invited Commentary: Using Vital Statistics Databases for Perinatal Epidemiology: Does the Quality Go In Before the Name Goes On?
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2001; 154(10): 889 - 890.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.