Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hickman, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Angelis, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hickman, M.
Right arrow Articles by de Angelis, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 7 : 632-641
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Estimating the Relative Incidence of Heroin Use: Application of a Method for Adjusting Observed Reports of First Visits to Specialized Drug Treatment Agencies

Matthew Hickman1, Shaun Seaman2 and Daniela de Angelis3,4

1 Centre for Research on Drugs and Health Behaviour, Social Science and Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Reynolds Building, St. Dunstan's Road, London W6 8RP, United Kingdom.
2 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 170, 16 avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94807 Villejuif, France.
3 MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, United Kingdom.
4 Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, Public Health Laboratory Service, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, United Kingdom.

In this paper, the authors propose a method for estimating the incidence of heroin use by adjusting reported numbers of heroin users visiting drug treatment agencies for the time lag between onset of heroin use and first treatment request (lag distribution). The adjusted incidence is relative, since it represents the number of individuals beginning heroin use in each year whose cases will be reported within 8 years of starting use. Users with longer lag times or whose cases are never reported are excluded. Utilizing data from southeastern England (1991–1998), the authors analyzed the effects of covariates (sex, age group, ethnic group, route of consumption, and year of onset of drug use) on the lag distribution. Trends in the adjusted incidence of heroin use were very different for injectors and noninjectors: Incidence among injectors seemed to be stable, while in noninjectors it increased twofold between 1991 and 1996–1997. These results must be interpreted cautiously, especially in relation to the wider context of underlying trends in the population. Potential biases derive from underreporting and from changes in the proportion of heroin users in treatment. The lag correction method adds substantially to the value of routine treatment data, at least for heroin use, and is potentially the best method for obtaining estimates of incidence.

epidemiologic methods; heroin; incidence; substance abuse, intravenous; substance-related disorders

Abbreviations: AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. De Angelis, M. Hickman, and S. Yang
Estimating Long-term Trends in the Incidence and Prevalence of Opiate Use/Injecting Drug Use and the Number of Former Users: Back-Calculation Methods and Opiate Overdose Deaths
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2004; 160(10): 994 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
T Millar, N Craine, T Carnwath, and M Donmall
The dynamics of heroin use; implications for intervention
J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2001; 55(12): 930 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.