Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garabrant, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garabrant, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 6 : 515-522
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Latex Sensitization in Health Care Workers and in the US General Population

David H. Garabrant1, H. Daniel Roth2, Romain Parsad2, Gui-Shuang Ying3 and Jay Weiss4

1 Department of Environmental and Industrial Health, University of Michigan School of Public Health and University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
2 Roth and Associates, Inc., Rockville, MD.
3 Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
4 Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA.

Sensitization to natural rubber latex is a prerequisite to type I immediate hypersensitivity reactions (urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis, and allergic rhinitis) that result from subsequent latex exposure. This study examines occupations in which latex glove use is common to determine whether it is associated with increased prevalence odds of latex sensitization (measured by latex-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies) by using data from 5,512 adults aged 17–60 years from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–1991). After other factors associated with latex sensitization were controlled for, there was a nonsignificant association between longest-held jobs in health care and latex sensitization (odds ratio (OR) = 1.49, 95 percent confidence interval (CI): 0.92, 2.40). For current occupations, latex sensitization was not associated with health care work in which gloves were used (OR = 1.17, 95 percent CI: 0.51, 2.65) or with other occupations in which latex glove use is common (OR = 1.01, 95 percent CI: 0.49, 2.07) compared with other occupations. Current health care workers who reported not using gloves were at increased risk of latex sensitization, both among those without a history of childhood atopy (OR = 2.30, 95 percent CI: 1.04, 5.13) and those with such a history (OR = 28.04, 95 percent CI: 3.64, 215.97). This odds ratio heterogeneity suggests that subjects with childhood atopy may be at high risk of latex sensitization.

asthma; IgE; latex; latex allergy; rhinitis, allergic, perennial

Abbreviations: CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CI, confidence interval; IgE, immunoglobulin E; NHANES III, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; OR, odds ratio.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. D. Budnick, D. H. Garabrant, H. D. Roth, R. Prasad, G.-S. Ying, and J. Weiss
RE: "LATEX SENSITIZATION IN HEALTH CARE WORKERS AND IN THE US GENERAL POPULATION"
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2001; 154(2): 190 - 191.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Infect. DiseasesHome page
Latex Sensitization
Journal Watch Infectious Diseases, April 27, 2001; 2001(427): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. Wartenberg and G. Buckler
Invited Commentary: Assessing Latex Sensitization Using Data from NHANES III
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2001; 153(6): 523 - 526.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. H. Garabrant, H. D. Roth, R. Parsad, G.-S. Ying, and J. Weiss
Garabrant et al. Respond to Wartenberg and Buckler
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2001; 153(6): 527 - 528.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.