American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 12 : 1222-1226
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Commentary: Practical Advantages of Bayesian Analysis of Epidemiologic Data
In the past decade, there have been enormous advances in the use of Bayesian methodology for analysis of epidemiologic data, and there are now many practical advantages to the Bayesian approach. Bayesian models can easily accommodate unobserved variables such as an individual's true disease status in the presence of diagnostic error. The use of prior probability distributions represents a powerful mechanism for incorporating information from previous studies and for controlling confounding. Posterior probabilities can be used as easily interpretable alternatives to p values. Recent developments in Markov chain Monte Carlo methodology facilitate the implementation of Bayesian analyses of complex data sets containing missing observations and multidimensional outcomes. Tools are now available that allow epidemiologists to take advantage of this powerful approach to assessment of exposure-disease relations.
Bayes theorem; epidemiologic methods; hierarchical Bayes; latent variable; Markov chain Monte Carlo; posterior probability; prior distribution
Abbreviations: ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; MCMC, Markov chain Monte Carlo
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. B. Salah, Y. Kamarianakis, S. Chlif, N. B. Alaya, and P. Prastacos Zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in central Tunisia: spatio temporal dynamics Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 36(5): 991 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Holzer, M. Mullner, F. Sterz, O. Robak, A. Kliegel, H. Losert, G. Sodeck, T. Uray, A. Zeiner, and A. N. Laggner Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Cooling After Cardiac Arrest: Cohort Study and Bayesian Approach Stroke, July 1, 2006; 37(7): 1792 - 1797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Khoury, R. Millikan, J. Little, and M. Gwinn The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2004; 33(5): 936 - 944. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M Assuncao and M. S. Castro Multiple cancer sites incidence rates estimation using a multivariate Bayesian model Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 508 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Bigelow, D. B. Dunson, J. B. Stanford, R. Ecochard, C. Gnoth, and B. Colombo Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 889 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.B. Dunson, I. Sinai, and B. Colombo The relationship between cervical secretions and the daily probabilities of pregnancy: effectiveness of the TwoDay Algorithm Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2278 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


