Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 1 : 27-29
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Invited Commentary: Studying the Epidemiology of Uterine Leiomyomata—Past, Present, and Future

Stephen M. Schwartz1,2

1 Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Uterine leiomyomata have a substantial impact on women's reproductive health, but epidemiologists have focused relatively little energy on identifying risk factors for this condition. Only a handful of studies, most of which were not designed to address methodological challenges posed by these tumors, have been conducted. These studies focused almost exclusively on reproductive and hormonal characteristics as possible risk factors, but consistent relations have not emerged. Three new reports (from two studies) in this issue of the Journal target the paucity of information on uterine leiomyomata risk factors by testing novel hypotheses, by employing designs that incorporate subclinical tumors or account for variable management of clinically recognized disease, or by using a combination of these approaches. The success of these strategies and the contributions of the new findings are discussed. Recommendations are made for a program of research that eventually could improve our knowledge of uterine leiomyomata etiology and yield clues to the prevention of associated morbidity.

leiomyoma; uterine diseases

Abbreviations: UL, uterine leiomyomata


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Risk Factors for Uterine Leiomyoma: A Practice-based Case-Control Study. I. African-American Heritage, Reproductive History, Body Size, and Smoking
Eduardo Faerstein, Moyses Szklo, and Neil Rosenshein
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001 153: 1-10. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  

Risk Factors for Uterine Leiomyoma: A Practice-based Case-Control Study. II. Atherogenic Risk Factors and Potential Sources of Uterine Irritation
Eduardo Faerstein, Moyses Szklo, and Neil B. Rosenshein
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001 153: 11-19. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  

Risk Factors for Uterine Fibroids among Women Undergoing Tubal Sterilization
Chao-Ru Chen, Germaine M. Buck, Norman G. Courey, Kimberly M. Perez, and Jean Wactawski-Wende
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001 153: 20-26. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.R.W. Williams, H.O.D. Critchley, J. Osei, S. Ingamells, I.T. Cameron, C. Han, and K. Chwalisz
The effects of the selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil on the morphology of uterine tissues after 3 months treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomata
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1696 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. D. Baird, D. B. Dunson, M. C. Hill, D. Cousins, and J. M. Schectman
Association of Physical Activity with Development of Uterine Leiomyoma
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2007; 165(2): 157 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. Boynton-Jarrett, J. Rich-Edwards, S. Malspeis, S. A. Missmer, and R. Wright
A Prospective Study of Hypertension and Risk of Uterine Leiomyomata
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2005; 161(7): 628 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Klip, F. E. van Leeuwen, R. Schats, C.W. Burger, and for the OMEGA project group
Risk of benign gynaecological diseases and hormonal disorders according to responsiveness to ovarian stimulation in IVF: a follow-up study of 8714 women
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1951 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C.-R. Chen, G. M. Buck, J. Wactawski-Wende, and K. M. Perez
Chen et al. Respond to "Studying the Epidemiology of Uterine Leiomyomata" by Schwartz
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2001; 153(1): 30 - 30.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.