American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 152, Issue 7 609-616, Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press
SW Andersson, A Niklasson, L Lapidus, L Hallberg, C Bengtsson and L Hulthen
Data from an ongoing prospective population study of women in Goteborg,
Sweden, were used to assess agreement between self-reported birth weight
and birth weight obtained from original delivery records of women aged
44-60 years. Of the eligible population with traced delivery records (n =
693), only 28% (n = 192) could report their own birth weight. Spearman
correlation between self-reported birth weight and birth weight from
original records was r = 0.76. However, a difference plot, with limits of
agreement at -1,028 to 1,038 g (95% confidence limits: lower limit, -1,157
to -901 g, upper limit, 910 to 1,166 g) revealed poor agreement between
methods. Of the self-reported birth weights, 53% were in error by 250 g or
more, and 31% were positively or negatively discordant by 500 g or more.
Application in an analysis of cardiovascular risk factors in adulthood
found conflicting results between self-reported and recorded birth weights.
Low reporting rate, poor reporting accuracy, and misleading findings in
application led to the conclusion that self-reported birth weights from
middle-aged women would not be a satisfactory replacement for birth weights
from original records.
ARTICLES
Poor agreement between self-reported birth weight and birth weight from original records in adult women
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Goteborg University, Sweden. susan.andersson@nutrition.gu.se
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Tehranifar, Y. Liao, J. D. Flom, and M. B. Terry Validity of Self-reported Birth Weight by Adult Women: Sociodemographic Influences and Implications for Life-Course Studies Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2009; 170(7): 910 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Colen, A. T. Geronimus, J. Bound, and S. A. James Maternal Upward Socioeconomic Mobility and Black-White Disparities in Infant Birthweight Am J Public Health, November 1, 2006; 96(11): 2032 - 2039. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Cerhan, T. A. Sellers, C. A. Janney, V. S. Pankratz, K. R. Brandt, and C. M. Vachon Prenatal and Perinatal Correlates of Adult Mammographic Breast Density Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1502 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Seghieri, R. Anichini, A. De Bellis, L. Alviggi, F. Franconi, and M. C. Breschi Relationship Between Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Low Maternal Birth Weight Diabetes Care, October 1, 2002; 25(10): 1761 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Sandhu, R. Luben, N. E. Day, and K.-T. Khaw Self-Reported Birth Weight and Subsequent Risk of Colorectal Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2002; 11(9): 935 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Allen, G. T. H. Ellison, I. dos Santos Silva, B. L. De Stavola, and I. S. Fentiman Determinants of the Availability and Accuracy of Self-reported Birth Weight in Middle-aged and Elderly Women Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2002; 155(4): 379 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



