Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Infante-Rivard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Infante-Rivard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 152, Issue 5 480-486, Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Empirical study of parental recall bias

C Infante-Rivard and L Jacques
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. cirivard@epid.lan.mcgill.ca

Recall bias is a major concern in case-control studies in which questionnaire data are used to assess past exposure. The authors conducted a validation substudy within the framework of a parent case- control study on risk factors for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children aged < or =9 years diagnosed in 1980-1993 in Quebec, Canada. Parental recall bias for two variables was assessed: reported distance from home to power lines compared with measured distance and reported prenatal radiographic examinations compared with hospital medical record data. For reported distance, sensitivity was 62% for a subgroup of cases living in an area in which an excess of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia was perceived and was attributed to power lines. However, for other cases, sensitivity (35%) was similar to that measured for hospital controls (36%) and was relatively close to that for population controls (22%). Specificity was high for all groups except cases from the area with a perceived excess. Sensitivity for reported prenatal radiographic examinations was similar for cases (64%) and population controls (71%) but was lower for hospital controls (50%). Results confirm that under special circumstances, such as those resulting from enhanced public concern, parental recall can be differential but otherwise is most often nondifferential, with low sensitivity. Choosing the best type of controls to ensure comparable recall accuracy remains difficult.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. Infante-Rivard, J. K. Vermunt, and C. R. Weinberg
Excess Transmission of the NAD(P)H:Quinone Oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) C609T Polymorphism in Families of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 165(11): 1248 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M J Nieuwenhuijsen
Design of exposure questionnaires for epidemiological studies
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2005; 62(4): 272 - 280.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
X. Ma, P. A. Buffler, M. Layefsky, M. B. Does, and P. Reynolds
Control Selection Strategies in Case-Control Studies of Childhood Diseases
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2004; 159(10): 915 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. Infante-Rivard
Hospital or Population Controls for Case-Control Studies of Severe Childhood Diseases?
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2003; 157(2): 176 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.