Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNutt, L.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNutt, L.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 152, Issue 5 438-441, Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Intimate partner violence prevalence estimation using telephone surveys: understanding the effect of nonresponse bias

LA McNutt and R Lee
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY 12144, USA.

To assess the effect of nonresponse bias in telephone prevalence studies of intimate partner violence, the authors asked women visiting a health center in Albany, New York, during 1998 about their willingness to participate in telephone surveys. Women physically victimized by a male partner were more likely than other women to say they would participate in telephone surveys (66.7% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.03). Among women severely victimized, those living with their partner were less willing to participate than those not cohabiting (45.5% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.03). Including questions about willingness to participate in telephone surveys in studies of other kinds may be a useful method of identifying nonresponse bias.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
R. M. Groves and E. Peytcheva
The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis
Public Opin Q, May 7, 2008; (2008) nfn011v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. L. Coker, V. C. Flerx, P. H. Smith, D. J. Whitaker, M. K. Fadden, and M. Williams
Intimate Partner Violence Incidence and Continuation in a Primary Care Screening Program
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 165(7): 821 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
E. Waltermaurer
Measuring Intimate Partner Violence (IPV): You May Only Get What You Ask For
J Interpers Violence, April 1, 2005; 20(4): 501 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
B. E. Carlson, L.-A. McNutt, and D. Y. Choi
Childhood and Adult Abuse among Women in Primary Health Care: Effects on Mental Health
J Interpers Violence, August 1, 2003; 18(8): 924 - 941.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.