Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sashegyi, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sashegyi, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 152, No. 12 : 1192-1200
Copyright © 2000 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Application of a Generalized Random Effects Regression Model for Cluster-correlated Longitudinal Data to a School-based Smoking Prevention Trial

Andreas I. Sashegyi1, K. Stephen Brown2 and Patrick J. Farrell3

1 Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
2 Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada.

In cluster-randomized trials, groups of subjects (clusters) are assigned to treatments, whereas observations are taken on the individual subjects. Since observations on subjects in the same cluster are typically more similar than observations from different clusters, analyses of such data must take intracluster correlation into account rather than assuming independence among all observations. Random effects models are useful for this purpose. The problem becomes more complicated if, in addition, repeated observations are taken on subjects over time. This introduces intraindividual correlation, which is typical for longitudinal studies. The Waterloo Smoking Prevention Project, study 3 (WSPP3), 1989–1996, is a study giving rise to cluster-correlated longitudinal data, where schools were randomized to either a smoking intervention program or to a control condition. Smoking status was assessed on grade 6 students in these schools, with annual follow-up observations throughout elementary and high school years. The authors illustrate the use of a generalized random effects model for analyzing this type of data. This model obtains appropriate estimates and standard errors for both individual-level covariates and those at the level of the cluster. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:1192–200.

clinical trials; health education; logistic models; models; statistical; schools; smoking; students

Abbreviations: GEE, generalized estimating equations; TVSFP, Television, School, and Family Project; WSPP3, Waterloo Smoking Prevention Project, study 3.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
M. L. Young, J. S. Preisser, B. F. Qaqish, and M. Wolfson
Comparison of subject-specific and population averaged models for count data from cluster-unit intervention trials
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 167 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. Isaakidis and J. P. A. Ioannidis
Evaluation of Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2003; 158(9): 921 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.