Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 150, No. 1: 88-96
Copyright © 1999 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Mismeasurement and the Resonance of Strong Confounders: Correlated Errors

James R. Marshall1, Janice L. Hastrup2 and Joseph S. Ross3

1Arizona Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, College of Medicine Tucson, AZ
2Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, NY
3School of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, NY

Confounding in epidemiology, and the limits of standard methods of control for an imperfectly measured confounder, have been understood for some time. However, most treatments of this problem are based on the assumption that errors of measurement in confounding and confounded variables are independent. This paper considers the situation in which a strong risk factor (confounder) and an inconsequential but suspected risk factor (confounded) are each measured with errors that are correlated; the situation appears especially likely to occur in the field of nutritional epidemiology. Error correlation appears to add little to measurement error as a source of bias in estimating the impact of a strong risk factor: it can add to, diminish, or reverse the bias induced by measurement error in estimating the impact of the inconsequential risk factor. Correlation of measurement errors can add to the difficulty involved in evaluating structures in which confounding and measurement error are present. In its presence, observed correlations among risk factors can be greater than, less than, or even opposite to the true correlations. Interpretation of multivariate epidemiologic structures in which confounding is likely requires evaluation of measurement error structures, including correlations among measurement errors. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:88–96.

confounding; disease susceptibility; epidemiologic methods; measurement error; risk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Fraser, R. Harris, N. Sattar, S. Ebrahim, G. D. Smith, and D.A. Lawlor
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Is Associated With Incident Vascular Events Independently of Alcohol Intake: Analysis of the British Women's Heart and Health Study and Meta-Analysis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2007; 27(12): 2729 - 2735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Marshall
Invited Commentary: Fewell and Colleagues Fuel for Debate
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2007; 166(6): 656 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
Z. Fewell, G. Davey Smith, and J. A. C. Sterne
The Impact of Residual and Unmeasured Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: A Simulation Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2007; 166(6): 646 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. P Fox, T. L Lash, and S. Greenland
A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2005; 34(6): 1370 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. B. Michels, C. S. Fuchs, E. Giovannucci, G. A. Colditz, D. J. Hunter, M. J. Stampfer, and W. C. Willett
Fiber Intake and Incidence of Colorectal Cancer among 76,947 Women and 47,279 Men
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2005; 14(4): 842 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
G Turrell, T Blakely, C Patterson, and B Oldenburg
A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic (small area) differences in household food purchasing behaviour
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2004; 58(3): 208 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Mannisto, S. A. Smith-Warner, D. Spiegelman, D. Albanes, K. Anderson, P. A. van den Brandt, J. R. Cerhan, G. Colditz, D. Feskanich, J. L. Freudenheim, et al.
Dietary Carotenoids and Risk of Lung Cancer in a Pooled Analysis of Seven Cohort Studies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2004; 13(1): 40 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. R. Marshall
Methodologic and Statistical Considerations Regarding Use of Biomarkers of Nutritional Exposure in Epidemiology
J. Nutr., March 1, 2003; 133(3): 881S - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
L. S. Wakschlag, K. E. Pickett, E. Cook Jr, N. L. Benowitz, and B. L. Leventhal
Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Severe Antisocial Behavior in Offspring: A Review
Am J Public Health, June 1, 2002; 92(6): 966 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. S. Sandhu, I. R. White, and K. McPherson
Systematic Review of the Prospective Cohort Studies on Meat Consumption and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analytical Approach
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2001; 10(5): 439 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. R. Marshall
{beta}-Carotene: a Miss for Epidemiology
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 1999; 91(24): 2068 - 2069.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.