American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 150, No. 1: 18-26
Copyright © 1999 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
other |
Adverse Work and Environmental Conditions Predict Occupational Injuries
The Israeli Cardiovascular Occupational Risk Factors Determination in Israel (CORDIS) Study
1Occupational Health Institute Ra'anana, Israel
2Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel
3Department of Statistics and Operation Research, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel
This study was designed to test whether the total objective adverse work and environmental conditions, expressed as the ergonomic stress level (ESL), would predict occupational injuries over a 2-year period. The study population consisted of 4,096 men from 21 factories in six industrial sectors who were studied as part of the Israeli Cardiovascular Occupational Risk Factors Determination in Israel (CORDIS) Study, 19851987. The ESL (assigned four levels, 14) was based on an ergonomic assessment which covered 17 risk factors pertaining to safety hazards, overcrowding, cognitive and physical demands, and environmental stressors. The ESL was found to be a highly reliable measure and stable over a period of 24 years. The incidence of injuries among workers in low ESL conditions (level 1) was 10.3%. It increased with higher ESL's 11.7% in level 2 (relative risk (RR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.861.50); 21.6% in level 3 (RR = 2.09, 95% Cl 1.682.62); and 23.8% in level 4 (RR = 2.31, 95% Cl 1.852.88). After adjustment for age, job experience, educational level, managerial status, and occupational status (white/blue collar), injury occurrence was significantly elevated for those at level 3 (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.46, 95% Cl 1.121.91) and level 4 (adjusted OR = 1.81, 95% Cl 1.392.37) but not for level 2 (adjusted OR = 0.87, 95% Cl 0.651.18). The authors conclude that adverse work and environmental conditions, objectively assessed, can predict occurrence of occupational injuries. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:1826.
accidents; occupational; environmental health; occupational health; risk; safety; stress; work; wounds and injuries
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E Poppius, H Virkkunen, M Hakama, and L Tenkanen The sense of coherence and risk of injuries: role of alcohol consumption and occupation J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2008; 62(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Niedhammer, J.-F. Chastang, and S. David Importance of psychosocial work factors on general health outcomes in the national French SUMER survey Occup. Med., January 1, 2008; 58(1): 15 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A d'Errico, L Punnett, M Cifuentes, J Boyer, J Tessler, R Gore, P Scollin, C Slatin, and Promoting Healthy and Safe Employment In Healthcar Hospital injury rates in relation to socioeconomic status and working conditions Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2007; 64(5): 325 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Gauchard, J. M. Mur, C. Touron, L. Benamghar, D. Dehaene, P. Perrin, and N. Chau Determinants of accident proneness: a case-control study in railway workers Occup. Med., May 1, 2006; 56(3): 187 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


