Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shavlik, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shavlik, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 148, No. 8: 810-818
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Validity of Dietary Recall Over 20 Years among California Seventh-day Adventists

Gary E. Fraser, Kristian D. Lindsted, Synnøve F. Knutsen, W. Lawrence Beeson, Hannelore Bennett and David J. Shavlik

From the Center for Health Research and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University Loma Linda, CA.

Past dietary habits are etiologically important to incident disease. Yet the validity of such measurements from the previous 10–20 years is poorly understood. In this study, the authors correlated food frequency results that were obtained in 1994–1995 but pertained to recalled diet in 1974 with the weighted mean of five random 24-hour dietary recalls obtained by telephone in 1974. The subjects studied were 72 Seventh-day Adventists who lived within 30 miles of Loma Linda, California; had participated in a 1974 validation study; were still alive; and were willing to participate again in 1994. A method was developed to allow correction for random error in the reference data when these data had differentially weighted components. The results showed partially corrected correlation coefficients of greater than 0.30 for coffee, whole milk, eggs, chips, beef, fish, chicken, fruit, and legumes. Higher correlations on average were obtained when the food frequencies were scored simply 1–9, reflecting the nine frequency categories. The 95% confidence intervals for 15 of the 28 correlations excluded zero. Incorporation of portion size information was unhelpful. The authors concluded that in this population, data recalled from 20 years ago should be treated with caution but, for a number of important foods, that the degree of validity achieved approached that obtained when assessing current dietary habits. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148:810–18.

diet surveys; food habits; history; recall


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. Shatenstein, H. Payette, S. Nadon, and K. Gray-Donald
An Approach for Evaluating Lifelong Intakes of Functional Foods in Elderly People
J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2384 - 2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. Pesch, U. Ranft, P. Jakubis, M. J. Nieuwenhuijsen, A. Hergemoller, K. Unfried, M. Jakubis, P. Miskovic, T. Keegan, and the EXPASCAN Study Group
Environmental Arsenic Exposure from a Coal-burning Power Plant as a Potential Risk Factor for Nonmelanoma Skin Carcinoma: Results from a Case-Control Study in the District of Prievidza, Slovakia
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2002; 155(9): 798 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. E. Fraser and D. J. Shavlik
Ten Years of Life: Is It a Matter of Choice?
Arch Intern Med, July 9, 2001; 161(13): 1645 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.