Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stoltenberg, C.
Right arrow Articles by Irgens, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stoltenberg, C.
Right arrow Articles by Irgens, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 148, No. 5: 452-459
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Influence of Consanguinity and Maternal Education on Risk of Stillbirth and Infant Death in Norway, 1967–1993

Camilla Stoltenberg1,, Per Magnus1, Rolv Terje Lie2, Anne Kjersti Daltveit2 and Lorentz M. Irgens2

1National Institute of Public Health Oslo, Norway
2Medical Birth Registry of Norway, University of Bergen Bergen, Norway

Reprint requests to Dr. Camilla Stoltenberg, Section of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health Sciences, National Institute of Public Health, P.O. Box 4404 Torshov, 0403 Oslo, Norway.

To analyze the influence of consanguinity and maternal education on stillbirth and infant death for children born in Norway between 1967 and 1993, the authors studied 7, 274 children of ethnic Pakistani origin and 1, 431, 055 children of Norwegian ethnic origin. Of these children, 31.0% of the Pakistani children and 0.1% of the Norwegian children had parents who were first cousins. Consanguinity increased the relative risk of stillbirth (odds ratio (OR) = 1.3, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.0–1.6) and infant death (OR = 2.4, 95% Cl 2.0–3.0), after adjustment for maternal education, maternal age, parity, and year of birth. In 1985–1993, 29% (95% Cl 13–45) of stillbirths and infant deaths among the Pakistani group were attributable to consanguinity. In the Norwegian group, 17% (95% Cl 13–21) of the deaths were attributable to factors associated with low maternal education, while in the Pakistani group, the corresponding estimate was nonsignificant. The risks of stillbirth and infant death were similar for children with non-consanguineous parents in both populations. This is an important observation considering the differences in socioeconomic status between the two groups. The authors conclude that consanguinity influenced stillbirth and infant death independent of maternal education, and that a large proportion of deaths could be attributed to consanguinity in the Pakistani group due to high frequencies of consanguinity. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 452–9.

consanguinity; education; ethnic groups; fetal death; genetics; infant death; social class


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. Stoltenberg
Commentary: Of the same blood
Int. J. Epidemiol., November 19, 2009; (2009) dyp312v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
A. M. Grjibovski, P. Magnus, and C. Stoltenberg
Decrease in consanguinity among parents of children born in Norway to women of Pakistani origin: A registry-based study
Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2009; 37(3): 232 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
S F. Villadsen, L H Mortensen, and A M N. Andersen
Ethnic disparity in stillbirth and infant mortality in Denmark 1981-2003
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2009; 63(2): 106 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
T. Jorgensen, L. H. Mortensen, and A.-M. Nybo Andersen
Social inequality in fetal and perinatal mortality in the Nordic countries
Scand J Public Health, August 1, 2008; 36(6): 635 - 649.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
K. Yunis, R. E. Rafei, and G. Mumtaz
International Perspectives: Consanguinity: Perinatal Outcomes and Prevention - A View from the Middle East
NeoReviews, February 1, 2008; 9(2): e59 - e65.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. Mumtaz, H. Tamim, M. Kanaan, M. Khawaja, M. Khogali, G. Wakim, K. A. Yunis, and for the National Collaborative Perinatal Neonatal
Effect of Consanguinity on Birth Weight for Gestational Age in a Developing Country
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 165(7): 742 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
T. W.J. Schulpen, J. C.M. van Wieringen, P. J. van Brummen, J. M. van Riel, F. A. Beemer, P. Westers, and J. Huber
Infant mortality, ethnicity, and genetically determined disorders in The Netherlands
Eur J Public Health, June 1, 2006; 16(3): 290 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
H. Devlieger, G. Martens, and A. Bekaert
Social inequalities in perinatal and infant mortality in the northern region of Belgium (the Flanders)
Eur J Public Health, February 1, 2005; 15(1): 15 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
A. Arntzen and A. M. N. Andersen
Social determinants for infant mortality in the Nordic countries, 1980 - 2001
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2004; 32(5): 381 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. Arntzen, S. O. Samuelsen, L. S Bakketeig, and C. Stoltenberg
Socioeconomic status and risk of infant death. A population-based study of trends in Norway, 1967-1998
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2004; 33(2): 279 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Vangen, C. Stoltenberg, R. Skjaerven, P. Magnus, J. R Harris, and B. Stray-Pedersen
The heavier the better? Birthweight and perinatal mortality in different ethnic groups
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2002; 31(3): 654 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.