| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 148, No. 3: 223-228
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
other |
Comments on a Meta-analysis of the Relation between Dietary Calcium Intake and Blood Pressure
Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5
Reprint requests to Dr. N. Birkett at this address.
The role of dietary calcium in the etiology of hypertension is controversial. In 1995, Cappuccio et al. (American Journal of Epidemiology, 1995;142:93545) examined this issue in a meta-analysis of observational studies published between 1983 and 1993. The author of the present paper reviewed the original studies underlying this meta-analysis and discovered that data from one study had been inappropriately extracted and converted, leading to an understatement of the calcium-blood pressure relation by a factor of about 30. This review also raised questions about the extraction and conversion of data from several other studies and about the statistical methods used. The author repeated the meta-analyses and discovered an unadjusted regression slope between dietary calcium and systolic blood pressure of 0.34 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 0.22) for men, 0.15 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI 0.19 to 0.11) for women, and 0.39 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI 0.47 to 0.31) for men and women. For diastolic blood pressure, the pooled regression slope for men was 0.22 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI 0.32 to 0.13), while for women it was 0.051 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI 0.090 to 0.012); for men and women it was 0.35 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI 0.67 to 0.02). These slopes are still modest but are larger than those reported in the original analysis. However, since all of these analyses were based on zero-order correlations or regressions, extreme caution must be exercised in interpreting the results. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:2238.
blood pressure; calcium; hypertension; meta-analysis; nutrition
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. M. Kris-Etherton, J. A. Grieger, K. F. Hilpert, and S. G. West Milk Products, Dietary Patterns and Blood Pressure Management J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2009; 28(Supplement_1): 103S - 119S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Dauchet, E. Kesse-Guyot, S. Czernichow, S. Bertrais, C. Estaquio, S. Peneau, A.-C. Vergnaud, S. Chat-Yung, K. Castetbon, V. Deschamps, et al. Dietary patterns and blood pressure change over 5-y follow-up in the SU.VI.MAX cohort Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1650 - 1656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Huth, D. B. DiRienzo, and G. D. Miller Major scientific advances with dairy foods in nutrition and health. J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1207 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R. Reid, A. Horne, B. Mason, R. Ames, U. Bava, and G. D. Gamble Effects of Calcium Supplementation on Body Weight and Blood Pressure in Normal Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 3824 - 3829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Schulze, K. Hoffmann, A. Kroke, and H. Boeing Risk of Hypertension among Women in the EPIC-Potsdam Study: Comparison of Relative Risk Estimates for Exploratory and Hypothesis-oriented Dietary Patterns Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2003; 158(4): 365 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Miller, J. K. Jarvis, and L. D. McBean The Importance of Meeting Calcium Needs with Foods J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2001; 20(2): 168S - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D L Weed Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory? J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2001; 55(2): 104 - 110. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nissen, R. L. Sharp, L. Panton, M. Vukovich, S. Trappe, and J. C. Fuller Jr. {beta}-Hydroxy-{beta}-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation in Humans Is Safe and May Decrease Cardiovascular Risk Factors J. Nutr., August 1, 2000; 130(8): 1937 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. A McCarron The dietary guideline for sodium: should we shake it up? Yes! Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2000; 71(5): 1013 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Miller, D. D. DiRienzo, M. E. Reusser, and D. A. McCarron Benefits of Dairy Product Consumption on Blood Pressure in Humans: A Summary of the Biomedical Literature J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2000; 19(90002): 147S - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. P Cappuccio Author defends meta-analysis that was criticised BMJ, July 24, 1999; 319(7204): 256b - 256. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Smith and M. Egger Meta-analyses of observational data should be done with due care BMJ, January 2, 1999; 318(7175): 56 - 56. [Full Text] |
||||







