Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birkett, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Birkett, N. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 148, No. 3: 223-228
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Comments on a Meta-analysis of the Relation between Dietary Calcium Intake and Blood Pressure

Nicholas J. Birkett

Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8M5

Reprint requests to Dr. N. Birkett at this address.

The role of dietary calcium in the etiology of hypertension is controversial. In 1995, Cappuccio et al. (American Journal of Epidemiology, 1995;142:935–45) examined this issue in a meta-analysis of observational studies published between 1983 and 1993. The author of the present paper reviewed the original studies underlying this meta-analysis and discovered that data from one study had been inappropriately extracted and converted, leading to an understatement of the calcium-blood pressure relation by a factor of about 30. This review also raised questions about the extraction and conversion of data from several other studies and about the statistical methods used. The author repeated the meta-analyses and discovered an unadjusted regression slope between dietary calcium and systolic blood pressure of –0.34 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% confidence interval (CI) –0.46 to –0.22) for men, –0.15 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI –0.19 to –0.11) for women, and –0.39 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI –0.47 to –0.31) for men and women. For diastolic blood pressure, the pooled regression slope for men was –0.22 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI –0.32 to –0.13), while for women it was –0.051 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI –0.090 to –0.012); for men and women it was –0.35 mmHg/100 mg per day (95% CI –0.67 to –0.02). These slopes are still modest but are larger than those reported in the original analysis. However, since all of these analyses were based on zero-order correlations or regressions, extreme caution must be exercised in interpreting the results. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:223–8.

blood pressure; calcium; hypertension; meta-analysis; nutrition


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
P. M. Kris-Etherton, J. A. Grieger, K. F. Hilpert, and S. G. West
Milk Products, Dietary Patterns and Blood Pressure Management
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2009; 28(Supplement_1): 103S - 119S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. Dauchet, E. Kesse-Guyot, S. Czernichow, S. Bertrais, C. Estaquio, S. Peneau, A.-C. Vergnaud, S. Chat-Yung, K. Castetbon, V. Deschamps, et al.
Dietary patterns and blood pressure change over 5-y follow-up in the SU.VI.MAX cohort
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1650 - 1656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. J. Huth, D. B. DiRienzo, and G. D. Miller
Major scientific advances with dairy foods in nutrition and health.
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1207 - 1221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. R. Reid, A. Horne, B. Mason, R. Ames, U. Bava, and G. D. Gamble
Effects of Calcium Supplementation on Body Weight and Blood Pressure in Normal Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 3824 - 3829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. B. Schulze, K. Hoffmann, A. Kroke, and H. Boeing
Risk of Hypertension among Women in the EPIC-Potsdam Study: Comparison of Relative Risk Estimates for Exploratory and Hypothesis-oriented Dietary Patterns
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2003; 158(4): 365 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
G. D. Miller, J. K. Jarvis, and L. D. McBean
The Importance of Meeting Calcium Needs with Foods
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2001; 20(2): 168S - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
D L Weed
Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory?
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2001; 55(2): 104 - 110.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Nissen, R. L. Sharp, L. Panton, M. Vukovich, S. Trappe, and J. C. Fuller Jr.
{beta}-Hydroxy-{beta}-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation in Humans Is Safe and May Decrease Cardiovascular Risk Factors
J. Nutr., August 1, 2000; 130(8): 1937 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. A McCarron
The dietary guideline for sodium: should we shake it up? Yes!
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2000; 71(5): 1013 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
G. D. Miller, D. D. DiRienzo, M. E. Reusser, and D. A. McCarron
Benefits of Dairy Product Consumption on Blood Pressure in Humans: A Summary of the Biomedical Literature
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2000; 19(90002): 147S - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
F. P Cappuccio
Author defends meta-analysis that was criticised
BMJ, July 24, 1999; 319(7204): 256b - 256.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. D. Smith and M. Egger
Meta-analyses of observational data should be done with due care
BMJ, January 2, 1999; 318(7175): 56 - 56.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.