Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wirfält, A. K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Elmer, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wirfält, A. K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Elmer, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 148, No. 12: 1148-1156
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Comparison of Food Frequency Questionnaires: The Reduced Block and Willett Questionnaires Differ in Ranking on Nutrient Intakes

A. K. Elisabet Wirfält1,, Robert W. Jeffery2 and Patricia J. Elmer2

1The Malmö Diet Cancer Study, University of Lund Malmö Sweden
2Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN

Reprint requests to Dr. Elisabet Wirfalt, The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study, University of Lund, Claesgatan 7, SE-205 02 Malmo, Sweden.

Food frequency questionnaires, major tools in epidemiologic studies, are often criticized for biased and imprecise intake estimates. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two widely used food frequency questionnaires, a reduced 60-item Block questionnaire and a 153-item Willett food frequency questionnaire, relative to three 24-hour recalls administered by telephone. The dietary data were collected in 1991 from a group of healthy women age 25–49 years (n = 101) during the baseline period of a weight-loss intervention study in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Total energy and macro- and micronutrient intakes were compared across methods by using four analytic approaches: comparison of means and correlation coefficients, regression analysis, and estimation of percent agreement between each questionnaire and recalls. The Block instrument showed an overall underestimation bias, but was more successful in categorizing individuals on percent energy from fat and carbohydrate intakes than was the Willett instrument. The Willett instrument showed no overall underestimation bias and was more successful in classifying individuals on vitamin A and calcium intakes. Diverging performance characteristics of diet assessment methods have an implication for the design of studies, interpretation of results, and comparison of findings across studies. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 1148–56.

bias (epidemiology); diet; epidemiologic methods; nutrition assessment; nutrition surveys; questionnaires


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. L. Molag, J. H. M. de Vries, M. C. Ocke, P. C. Dagnelie, P. A. van den Brandt, M. C. J. F. Jansen, W. A. van Staveren, and P. van't Veer
Design Characteristics of Food Frequency Questionnaires in Relation to Their Validity
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2007; 166(12): 1468 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Cantwell, B. Mittl, J. Curtin, R. Carroll, N. Potischman, N. Caporaso, and R. Sinha
Relative Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire with a Meat-Cooking and Heterocyclic Amine Module
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2004; 13(2): 293 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Byrne, H. Rockett, and M. D. Holmes
Dietary Fat, Fat Subtypes, and Breast Cancer Risk: Lack of an Association among Postmenopausal Women with No History of Benign Breast Disease
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2002; 11(3): 261 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. D. Shoob, R. G. Sargent, S. J. Thompson, R. G. Best, J. W. Drane, and A. Tocharoen
Dietary Methionine Is Involved in the Etiology of Neural Tube Defect-Affected Pregnancies in Humans
J. Nutr., October 1, 2001; 131(10): 2653 - 2658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.