Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Swerdlow, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Swerdlow, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 148, No. 10: 1012-1017
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

other

Bias in the Standardized Mortality Ratio when Using General Population Rates to Estimate Expected Number of Deaths

Michael E. Jones and Anthony J. Swerdlow

From the Epidemiological Monitoring Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London London, United Kingdom

Cohort studies often compare the observed number of cases arising in a group under investigation with the number expected to occur on the basis of general population rates. The general population is taken to represent unexposed persons, but it is almost inevitably biased in that it comprises all types of people including exposed ones. To identify circumstances when this bias matters, the authors modeled its effect in relation to the size of the observed standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and the prevalence of exposed individuals in the general population. The authors found that bias may be a major problem, causing substantial underestimation of the true relative risk, when either the prevalence of exposure in the general population or the SMR are large. The bias can cause an apparent trend in SMRs with age when none exists. It also places a limit on the maximum size of the observed SMR, no matter how large the true relative risk. A table is provided showing the extent of bias in different circumstances. Cohort studies of people with common diseases or exposures, or that find large SMRs, when using general population expectations, need to consider the extent of bias from this source. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148:1012–17.

bias (epidemiology); mortality; standardized mortality ratio


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JCOHome page
J.-P. Spano, D. Costagliola, C. Katlama, N. Mounier, E. Oksenhendler, and D. Khayat
AIDS-Related Malignancies: State of the Art and Therapeutic Challenges
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2008; 26(29): 4834 - 4842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
N. A Roper, R. W Bilous, W. F Kelly, N. C Unwin, and V. M Connolly
Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study
BMJ, June 9, 2001; 322(7299): 1389 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Godward, M. Sandhu, J. Skinner, and J. McCann
Re: Cellular Telephones and Cancer--a Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 6, 2001; 93(11): 878 - 878.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
R. Bender, K.-H. Jockel, C. Trautner, M. Spraul, and M. Berger
Effect of Age on Excess Mortality in Obesity
JAMA, April 28, 1999; 281(16): 1498 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.