Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ottenbacher, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ottenbacher, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 147, No. 7: 615-619
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Quantitative Evaluation of Multiplicity in Epidemiology and Public Health Research

Kenneth J. Ottenbacher

University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, Galveston, TX

Reprint requests to Dr. Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, SAHS, Rm. 4.202, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77755-1028.

Epidemiologic and public health researchers frequently include several dependent variables, repeated assessments, or subgroup analyses in their investigations. These factors result in multiple tests of statistical significance and may produce type 1 experimental errors. This study examined the type 1 error rate in a sample of public health and epidemiologic research. A total of 173 articles chosen at random from 1996 issues of the American Journal of Public Health and the American Journal of Epidemiology were examined to determine the incidence of type 1 errors. Three different methods of computing type 1 error rates were used: experiment-wise error rate, error rate per experiment, and percent error rate. The results indicate a type 1 error rate substantially higher than the traditionally assumed level of 5% (p < 0.05). No practical or statistically significant difference was found between type 1 error rates across the two journals. Methods to determine and correct type 1 errors should be reported in epidemiologic and public health research investigations that include multiple statistical tests. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 615–19.

bias (epidemiology); probability; research design; significance tests


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
A. Farcomeni
A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 347 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
C. E. O'Neil and T. A. Nicklas
A Review of the Relationship Between 100% Fruit Juice Consumption and Weight in Children and Adolescents
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, July 1, 2008; 2(4): 315 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
C. R. Gale, G. D. Batty, and I. J. Deary
Locus of Control at Age 10 Years and Health Outcomes and Behaviors at Age 30 Years: The 1970 British Cohort Study
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2008; 70(4): 397 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. Wu, R. Bowman, A. A. Welch, R. N. Luben, N. Wareham, K.-T. Khaw, and S. A. Bingham
Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms, dietary fat and fibre, and serum lipids: the EPIC Norfolk study
Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2007; 28(23): 2930 - 2936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
P F Ricci, L A Cox Jr, and T R MacDonald
Science-policy in environmental and health risk assessment: if we cannot do without, can we do better?
Human and Experimental Toxicology, January 1, 2006; 25(1): 29 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
E. von Elm and M. Egger
The scandal of poor epidemiological research
BMJ, October 16, 2004; 329(7471): 868 - 869.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. J Pocock, T. J Collier, K. J Dandreo, B. L de Stavola, M. B Goldman, L. A Kalish, L. E Kasten, and V. A McCormack
Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice
BMJ, October 16, 2004; 329(7471): 883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. D. Comstock, E. M. Castillo, and S. P. Lindsay
Four-Year Review of the Use of Race and Ethnicity in Epidemiologic and Public Health Research
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2004; 159(6): 611 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.