Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fenster, L.
Right arrow Articles by Benowitz, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fenster, L.
Right arrow Articles by Benowitz, N. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 147, No. 5: 503-510
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Rate of Caffeine Metabolism and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion

Laura Fenster1, Chris Quale1, Robert A. Hiatt2, Margaret Wilson3, Gayle C. Windham1 and Neal L. Benowitz3

1Reproductive Epidemiology Section, Department of Health Services Emeryville, CA
2Kaiser Permanente Division of Research Oakland, CA
3Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, CA

In a case-control study of 73 women with and 141 women without spontaneous abortion, the authors determined the activity of the three principal caffeine-metabolizing enzymes—cytochrome P-4501A2 (CYP1A2), xanthine oxidase, and N-acetyltransferase 2—by measuring levels of caffeine metabolites in urine. After examining the effect of enzyme activity and different levels of caffeine intake, they concluded that there was no evidence that an interaction between enzyme activity and caffeine intake during pregnancy resulted in risk of spontaneous abortion. In a subsample comparing 24 cases with recurrent (two or more) spontaneous abortions and 21 controls with two or more livebirths and no previous spontaneous abortions, the unadjusted odds ratio for low CYP1A2 enzyme activity (below the median) was 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.28-3.04) compared with higher CYP1A2 activity. The odds ratio for risk of recurent spontaneous abortion and low xanthine oxidase activity (below the median) versus higher activity was 0.37 (95% CI 0.10–1.29). Phenotypically slow acetyiators (N-acetyltransferase 2 index <0.37) had an odds ratio of 1.58 (95% CI 0.48-5.13) for recurrent loss compared with rapid acetylators. Thus, some association of the latter two caffeine-metabolizing enzymes with recurrent spontaneous abortion is suggested but may also be due to chance. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147:503–10.

abortion; acetyltransferases; caffeine; cytochrome P-450; metabolism; xanthine oxidase


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
B. H. Bech, H. Autrup, E. A. Nohr, T. B. Henriksen, and J. Olsen
Stillbirth and slow metabolizers of caffeine: comparison by genotypes
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 948 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
F. Sata, H. Yamada, K. Suzuki, Y. Saijo, E. H Kato, M. Morikawa, H. Minakami, and R. Kishi
Caffeine intake, CYP1A2 polymorphism and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 11(5): 357 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. P. Torfs and R. E. Christianson
Effect of Maternal Smoking and Coffee Consumption on the Risk of Having a Recognized Down Syndrome Pregnancy
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2000; 152(12): 1185 - 1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.