Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Closas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robins, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Closas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robins, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 147, No. 5: 426-433
Copyright © 1998 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Differential Misclassification and the Assessment of Gene-Environment Interactions in Case-Control Studies

Montserrat Garcia-Closas1,, W. Douglas Thompson2 and James M. Robins1,3

1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA
2Applied Medical Sciences, School of Applied Science, University of Southern Maine Portland, ME
3Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, MA

Reprint requests to Dr. Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, EPN/443, 6130 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892–7374.

In case-control studies of interactions between genetic and environmental exposures, differential misclassification of the environmental exposure with respect to disease status can introduce spurious heterogeneity of the stratum-specific odds ratios. In this paper, the authors identify conditions under which differential misclassification does not introduce bias in the interaction parameter when no multiplicative interaction is present, and it biases the interaction parameter toward the null value when a multiplicative interaction is present. The conditions are that (i) conditional on potential confounders, the environmental exposure is independent of the genotype among the controls, and (ii) misclassification of the environmental exposure is nondifferential with respect to the genotype. These conditions can be tested from the misclassified data in the control group, since a test of the independence of the genotype and the misclassified environmental exposure among the controls is a test of the joint hypothesis that conditions (i) and (ii) are both true. Therefore, the authors propose a two-step test for interaction which first tests conditions (i) and (ii) and then goes on to test for interaction, provided the first step hypothesis is not rejected. A summary test procedure to test for gene-environment interactions in the presence of misclassification, based on both a conventional test for interaction and the two-step test, is recommended, and is illustrated with data from a case-control study of the role of diet as a modifier of the association between a metabolic polymorphism and lung cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147:426–33.

case-control studies; epidemiologic methods; misclassification


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. A. Newcomb, J. Baron, M. Cotterchio, S. Gallinger, J. Grove, R. Haile, D. Hall, J. L. Hopper, J. Jass, L. Le Marchand, et al.
Colon Cancer Family Registry: An International Resource for Studies of the Genetic Epidemiology of Colon Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2331 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S.E. Steck, M.M. Gaudet, J.A. Britton, S.L. Teitelbaum, M.B. Terry, A.I. Neugut, R.M. Santella, and M.D. Gammon
Interactions among GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms, cruciferous vegetable intake and breast cancer risk
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 1954 - 1959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. R. Weiss, M. R. Baer, C. B. Ambrosone, J. G. Blanco, A. Hutson, L. A. Ford, and K. B. Moysich
Concordance of Pharmacogenetic Polymorphisms in Tumor and Germ Line DNA in Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 1038 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. S. Pombo-de-Oliveira, S. Koifman, and Brazilian Collaborative Study Group of Infant Acut
Infant Acute Leukemia and Maternal Exposures during Pregnancy
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2336 - 2341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Ahn, C. B. Ambrosone, P. A. Kanetsky, C. Tian, T. A. Lehman, S. Kropp, I. Helmbold, D. von Fournier, W. Haase, M. L. Sautter-Bihl, et al.
Polymorphisms in Genes Related to Oxidative Stress (CAT, MnSOD, MPO, and eNOS) and Acute Toxicities from Radiation Therapy following Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 12(23): 7063 - 7070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Ahn, M. D. Gammon, R. M. Santella, M. M. Gaudet, J. A. Britton, S. L. Teitelbaum, M. B. Terry, S. Nowell, W. Davis, C. Garza, et al.
Associations between Breast Cancer Risk and the Catalase Genotype, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and Supplement Use
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 943 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P. Kraft and D. Hunter
Integrating epidemiology and genetic association: the challenge of gene-environment interaction
Phil Trans R Soc B, August 29, 2005; 360(1460): 1609 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W. Zhou, G. Liu, D. P. Miller, S. W. Thurston, L. L. Xu, J. C. Wain, T. J. Lynch, L. Su, and D. C. Christiani
Polymorphisms in the DNA Repair Genes XRCC1 and ERCC2, Smoking, and Lung Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2003; 12(4): 359 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. Zhou, G. Liu, D. P. Miller, S. W. Thurston, L. L. Xu, J. C. Wain, T. J. Lynch, L. Su, and D. C. Christiani
Gene-Environment Interaction for the ERCC2 Polymorphisms and Cumulative Cigarette Smoking Exposure in Lung Cancer
Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 62(5): 1377 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W. Zhou, G. Liu, S. W. Thurston, L. L. Xu, D. P. Miller, J. C. Wain, T. J. Lynch, L. Su, and D. C. Christiani
Genetic Polymorphisms in N-acetyltransferase-2 and Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase, Cumulative Cigarette Smoking, and Lung Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 15 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
M. Garcia-Closas, S. E. Hankinson, S.-m. Ho, D. C. Malins, N. L. Polissar, S. N. Schaefer, Y. Su, and M. A. Vinson
Chapter 9: Factors Critical to the Design and Execution of Epidemiologic Studies and Description of an Innovative Technology to Follow the Progression From Normal to Cancer Tissue
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, July 1, 2000; 2000(27): 147 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. M. Marcus, R. B. Hayes, P. Vineis, M. Garcia-Closas, N. E. Caporaso, H. Autrup, R. A. Branch, J. Brockmöller, T. Ishizaki, A. E. Karakaya, et al.
Cigarette Smoking, N-Acetyltransferase 2 Acetylation Status, and Bladder Cancer Risk: A Case-Series Meta-analysis of a Gene-Environment Interaction
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2000; 9(5): 461 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Garcia-Closas, N. Rothman, and J. Lubin
Misclassification in Case-Control Studies of Gene-Environment Interactions: Assessment of Bias and Sample Size
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 1999; 8(12): 1043 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.