Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Borkowf, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gail, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Borkowf, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gail, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 146, No. 6: 520-526
Copyright © 1997 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

research-article

On Measures of Agreement Calculated from Contingency Tables with Categories Defined by the Empirical Quantiles of the Marginal Distributions

Craig B. Borkowf and Mitchell H. Gail

National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Biostatistics Branch Bethesda, MD

Reprint requests to Dr. Craig B. Borkowf, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, Office of Biostatistics Research, Two Rockledge Centre, Room 8100D, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7938, Bethesda, MD 20892-7938

Epidemiologists sometimes collect bivariate continuous data on a number of subjects, compute the empirical (sample) quantiles of the marginal data, and then use these values to partition the original data into two-way contingency tables. Tables created in this manner have row and column categories defined by the random empirical marginal quantiles rather than by preset cutpoints, so these tables have fixed marginal totals. Hence, instead of the conventional multinomial distribution, these tables have the empirical bivariate quantile-partitioned (EBQP) distribution. In this paper, the authors demonstrate how to use empirical methods appropriate for EBQP tables to make inferences and construct confidence intervals for three commonly used measures of agreement: kappa, weighted kappa, and another class of measures derived from conditional proportions in the extreme rows of the table. They also show that if one incorrectly applies conventional methods appropriate for multinomial tables to statistics calculated from EBQP tables, one can obtain substantially misleading results. In addition, the authors present alternative parametric methods for estimating these measures of agreement and illustrate corresponding methods of inference and confidence interval construction. Finally, they show that these empirical (EBQP) methods can have low efficiency compared with parametric methods for some of these measures of agreement. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:520-6.

epidemiologic methods; nutrition surveys; questionnaries; statistics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.