Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warnecke, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Jobe, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warnecke, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Jobe, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 146, No. 11: 982-992
Copyright © 1997 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Cognitive Aspects of Recalling and Reporting Health-related Events: Papanicolaou Smears, Clinical Breast Examinations, and Mammograms

Richard B. Warnecke1,, Seymour Sudman1,2, Timothy P. Johnson1, Diane O'Rourke1, Andrew M. Davis3 and Jared B. Jobe4

1Survey Research Laboratory, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, IL
2College of Commerce, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL
3RUSH-Anchor Health Maintenance Organization Chicago, IL
4National Institute of Aging, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services Bethesda, MD

Reprint requests to Dr. Richard B. Warnecke, Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, 910 W. Van Buren, Suite 500, M/C 336, Chicago, IL 60607

This paper reports an examination of cognitive processes used by 178 women aged 50 years and older in retrieving Information about the frequency with which they received Papanicolaou smears, mammograms, and clinical breast examinations. Women were selected from a health maintenance organization in which they had been enrolled for at least 51/2 years. The literature suggested that reporting of regular events such as these kinds of tests is likely to be based on schemas, which is an estimation technique in which events are reported in a format with generic content. Thus, it the procedure is believed to occur annually, the respondent will report receiving five tests in 5 years. The study attempted to evaluate whether use of episodic recall, in which respondents are forced to report individual events, would be more accurate than reports based on estimation using a schema format. The results indicated that most of the errors occurred in Papanicolaou smear reporting, which is consistent with the literature, and that the fewest errors occurred with mammograms. Regardless of the questionnaire format, respondents persisted in using schemas based on the date of annual physical examination. Most reporting errors occurred because the interval between examinations was estimated incorrectly.

mammography; Papanicolaou smear; questionnaires; retrospective studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med ScreenHome page
O. Klungsoyr, M. Nygard, G. Skare, T. Eriksen, and J. F Nygard
Validity of self-reported Pap smear history in Norwegian women
J Med Screen, June 1, 2009; 16(2): 91 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
M. E. Fernandez, A. Gonzales, G. Tortolero-Luna, J. Williams, M. Saavedra-Embesi, W. Chan, and S. W. Vernon
Effectiveness of Cultivando La Salud: A Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Promotion Program for Low-Income Hispanic Women
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2009; 99(5): 936 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. M. Jones, S. J. Mongin, D. Lazovich, T. R. Church, and M. W. Yeazel
Validity of Four Self-reported Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities in a General Population: Differences over Time and by Intervention Assignment
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 777 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
T. J. Beebe, S. M. Jenkins, K. J. Anderson, M. E. Davern, and T. H. Rockwood
The Effects of Survey Mode and Asking About Future Intentions on Self-Reports of Colorectal Cancer Screening
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 785 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. Bastani, B. A. Glenn, A. E. Maxwell, P. A. Ganz, C. M. Mojica, and L. C. Chang
Validation of Self-reported Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening in a Study of Ethnically Diverse First-Degree Relatives of CRC Cases
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 791 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. H. Rauscher, T. P. Johnson, Y. I. Cho, and J. A. Walk
Accuracy of Self-Reported Cancer-Screening Histories: A Meta-analysis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 748 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. W. Vernon, J. A. Tiro, R. W. Vojvodic, S. Coan, P. M. Diamond, A. Greisinger, and M. E. Fernandez
Reliability and Validity of a Questionnaire to Measure Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: Does Mode of Survey Administration Matter?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 758 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. W. Vernon, D. J. del Junco, J. A. Tiro, S. P. Coan, C. A. Perz, L. A. Bastian, W. Rakowski, W. Chan, D. R. Lairson, A. McQueen, et al.
Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 347 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. P. Schenck, C. N. Klabunde, J. L. Warren, S. Peacock, W. W. Davis, S. T. Hawley, M. Pignone, and D. F. Ransohoff
Data Sources for Measuring Colorectal Endoscopy Use Among Medicare Enrollees
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 2118 - 2127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
J. R. Stark, E. R. Bertone-Johnson, M. E. Costanza, and A. M. Stoddard
Factors associated with colorectal cancer risk perception: the role of polyps and family history
Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2006; 21(5): 740 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
E. Puleo, J. G. Zapka, K. V. Goins, M. U. Yood, J. Mouchawar, M. Manos, C. Somkin, and S. Taplin
Recommendations for Care Related to Follow-Up of Abnormal Cancer Screening Tests: Accuracy of Patient Report
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2005; 28(3): 310 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. W. Vernon, H. Meissner, C. Klabunde, B. K. Rimer, D. J. Ahnen, R. Bastani, M. T. Mandelson, M. R. Nadel, S. Sheinfeld-Gorin, and J. Zapka
Measures for Ascertaining Use of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Behavioral, Health Services, and Epidemiologic Research
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2004; 13(6): 898 - 905.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. F. Aitken, P. H. Youl, M. Janda, M. Elwood, I. T. Ring, J. B. Lowe, and D. W. Firman
Validity of Self-reported Skin Screening Histories
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 159(11): 1098 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. K. Bobo, J. A. Shapiro, J. Schulman, and C. L. Wolters
On-Schedule Mammography Rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2004; 13(4): 620 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Sinaii, S.D. Cleary, M.L. Ballweg, L.K. Nieman, and P. Stratton
High rates of autoimmune and endocrine disorders, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome and atopic diseases among women with endometriosis: a survey analysis
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2715 - 2724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.