Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ambrosone, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kadlubar, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ambrosone, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Kadlubar, F. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 146, No. 11: 912-918
Copyright © 1997 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


article-commentary

Toward an Integrated Approach to Molecular Epidemiology

Christine B. Ambrosone and Fred F. Kadlubar

From the National Center Toxicological Research, Division of Molecular Epidemiology Jefferson, AR

Reprint requests to Dr. Christine B. Ambrosone, Division of Molecular Epidemiology (HFT-100), National Center for Toxicological Research, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079

The emergence of "molecular epidemiology" as a scientific approach within the fields of epidemiology and toxicology has led to spirited discussion within the biomedical community, particularly in the area of cancer research. At scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed journals, numerous issues have been raised not only with regard to the practice of molecular epidemiology, but also with regard to its role in traditional epidemiology, toxicology, and risk assessment. Furthermore, the utility of information gleaned from such studies and the implications for public heafth have been the subject of considerable debate. Conceptual differences in how one views the function of epidemiologic and laboratory research may be reflected in discussions on the merits of molecular epidemiology. This commentary reviews some of the prevailing attitudes toward molecular epidemiology, with the goal of identifying areas of concern and suggesting means of achieving harmonization. The need for cross-training of epidemiologists and laboratory scientists is discussed, and suggestions are made for building successful collaborative relations across disciplines.

biological markers; disease susceptibility, epidemiology; disease susceptibility, genetics; epidemiologic methods; epidemiology, molecular, methods; epidemiology, molecular, trends


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M Porta, N Malats, J Vioque, A Carrato, M Soler, L Ruiz, V Barbera, D Ayude, and F X Real
Incomplete overlapping of biological, clinical, and environmental information in molecular epidemiological studies: a variety of causes and a cascade of consequences
J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2002; 56(10): 734 - 738.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
J Decosas and N Padian
The profile and context of the epidemics of sexually transmitted infections including HIV in Zimbabwe
Sex Transm Inf, April 1, 2002; 78(90001): i40 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. Foxman and L. Riley
Molecular Epidemiology: Focus on Infection
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2001; 153(12): 1135 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. P. Perera
Molecular Epidemiology: On the Path to Prevention?
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 19, 2000; 92(8): 602 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
F. P. Perera and I.B. Weinstein
Molecular epidemiology: recent advances and future directions
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2000; 21(3): 517 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.