American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 145, No. 9: 834-841
Copyright © 1997 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
other |
Reliability and Validity of Proxy Respondent Information about Childhood Injury: An Assessment of a Canadian Surveillance System
1Departments of Community Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
2Departments of Paediatrics and Epidemiology and Btostatis-tics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Reprint requests to Dr. Colin Macarthur, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Hearth Sciences Center, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1.
The reliability and validity of proxy respondent information in the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program surveillance system was assessed. A standardized form was used to collect data on injury date, location, context (activity at the time), breakdown factor (what went wrong), mechanism, product involvement, safety precaution use, and motor vehicle involvement. Tine test-retest method determined reliability, with the kappa coefficient quantifying agreement between respondent information provided in the emergency department and later during a telephone interview. Of 421 eligible respondents, 325 (77%) completed the telephone interview, with a median time to interview of 33 hours (range 2470 hours). Agreement was high for all items; kappa coefficients ranged from 0.79 (substantial agreement) to 1.00 (perfect agreement). Reliability was not significantly modified by respondent view of the injury event, age of the child, language of the form, or level of respondent education. Validity was determined by measuring the agreement between respondent information and that provided by an independent witness. Witness information was considered to represent the truth. Of the 140 injury events selected, 92 (66%) had the form completed by both the original respondent and an independent witness. Kappa coefficients were greater than 0.65 for all but one item (safety precaution use), and the positive predictive value of respondent information for item categories whose prevalence was
0.25 ranged from 0.82 to 0.95. The authors conclude that proxy respondent data on childhood injury are both reliable and valid. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 145: 83441.
accidents; child; population surveillance; reproducibility of results
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Pless Surveillance alone is not the answer Inj. Prev., August 1, 2008; 14(4): 220 - 222. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tan, A. Ang, D. Heng, J. Chen, and H. Wong Evaluation of Playground Injuries based on ICD, E codes, International Classification of External Cause of Injury codes (ICECI), and Abbreviated Injury Scale coding systems Asia Pac J Public Health, March 1, 2007; 19(1): 18 - 27. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G S Smith, G S Sorock, H M Wellman, T K Courtney, and G S Pransky Blurring the distinctions between on and off the job injuries: similarities and differences in circumstances. Inj. Prev., August 1, 2006; 12(4): 236 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Macpherson, L. Rothman, and A. Howard Body-Checking Rules and Childhood Injuries in Ice Hockey Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): e143 - e147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Sznajder, B Chevallier, J Yacoubovitch, P Aegerter, and B Auvert Implementation of a system of surveillance of childhood injuries involved in a Safe Community program: the example of Boulogne-Billancourt (France) Inj. Prev., December 1, 2002; 8(4): 330 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Bartfay and A Donner The effect of collapsing multinomial data when assessing agreement Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2000; 29(6): 1070 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P A Leonard, T F Beattie, and D R Gorman Under representation of morbidity from paediatric bicycle accidents by official statistics--a need for data collection in the accident and emergency department Inj. Prev., December 1, 1999; 5(4): 303 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G Mackenzie and I. B. Pless CHIRPP: Canada's principal injury surveillance program Inj. Prev., September 1, 1999; 5(3): 208 - 213. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Macarthur and I. B. Pless Sensitivity and representativeness of a childhood injury surveillance system Inj. Prev., September 1, 1999; 5(3): 214 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Durbin, F. K. Winston, S. M. Applegate, E. K. Moll, and J. H. Holmes Development and Validation of the Injury Severity Assessment Survey/Parent Report: A New Injury Severity Assessment Survey Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 1999; 153(4): 404 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Journal Citations Inj. Prev., March 1, 1998; 4(1): 81 - 83. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




