Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (54)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spiegelman, D.
Right arrow Articles by McDermott, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spiegelman, D.
Right arrow Articles by McDermott, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 145, No. 2: 184-196
Copyright © 1997 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Measurement Error Correction for Logistic Regression Models with an "Alloyed Gold Standard"

Donna Spiegelman1,, Sebastian Schneeweiss2 and Aidan McDermott3

1Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Harvard University Boston, MA
2Postgraduate Program in Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Germany
3Department of Mathematics, University College-Galway Galway, Ireland

Reprint requests to Dr. Donna Spiegelman, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntingdon Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.

Recently, some authors have questioned the validity of methods which correct relative risk estimates for measurement error and misclassification when the "gold standard" used to obtain information about the measurement error process is itself imperfect. When such an "alloyed" gold standard is used to validate the usual exposure measurement, the bias in the "regression calibration" (Rosner et al., Stat Med 1989; 8: 1051–69) measurement-error correction factor for relative risks estimated from logistic regression models is derived. This quantity is a function of the correlations of the "alloyed" gold standard (X) and the usual exposure assessment method (Z) with the truth, of the ratio of the variances of X and Z, and of the correlation between the errors in the "alloyed" gold standard and the errors in the usual exposure assessment method. In this paper, it is proven that if the errors between Z and X are uncorrelated, the regression calibration method has no bias even when the gold standard is "alloyed." When a third method of exposure assessment is available and it is reasonable to assume that the errors in this method are uncorrelated with the errors in the other two exposure assessment methods, point and interval estimates of the correlation between the errors in X and Z are derived. These methods are illustrated here with data on the measurement of physical activity, vitamins A and E, and poly- and monounsaturated fat. In addition, when a third exposure assessment method is available, a modification of standard regression calibration is derived which can be used to calculate point and interval estimates of relative risk that are corrected for measurement error in both X and Z. This new method is illustrated here with data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, a study investigating the associations between physical activity and colon cancer incidence and between vitamin E intake and coronary heart disease. It is shown that in these examples, correlations of the errors in X and Z tended to be small. Even when moderate, estimates of relative risk corrected for error in both X and Z were not very different from the estimates which assumed that X was a true gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 145: 184–96.

bias (epidemiology); data interpretation, statistical; epidemiologic methods; logistic models; models, statistical; regression analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
H. Chu, S. R. Cole, Y. Wei, and J. G. Ibrahim
Estimation and inference for case-control studies with multiple non-gold standard exposure assessments: with an occupational health application
Biostat., October 1, 2009; 10(4): 591 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
R. Rostami, M. Nahm, and C. F Pieper
What can we learn from a decade of database audits? The Duke Clinical Research Institute experience, 1997--2006
Clinical Trials, April 1, 2009; 6(2): 141 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. E. Lee, D. Spiegelman, D. J. Hunter, D. Albanes, L. Bernstein, P. A. van den Brandt, J. E. Buring, E. Cho, D. R. English, J. L. Freudenheim, et al.
Fat, Protein, and Meat Consumption and Renal Cell Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of 13 Prospective Studies
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 3, 2008; 100(23): 1695 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. M van Dam and F. B Hu
Are alkylresorcinols accurate biomarkers for whole grain intake?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2008; 87(4): 797 - 798.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. Spiegelman
Commentary: Calculations of EPIC proportions
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 379 - 381.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Marshall
Invited Commentary: Fewell and Colleagues Fuel for Debate
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2007; 166(6): 656 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Thoresen
A Note on Correlated Errors in Exposure and Outcome in Logistic Regression
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2007; 166(4): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. E. Lee, D. J. Hunter, D. Spiegelman, H.-O. Adami, D. Albanes, L. Bernstein, P. A. van den Brandt, J. E. Buring, E. Cho, A. R. Folsom, et al.
Alcohol Intake and Renal Cell Cancer in a Pooled Analysis of 12 Prospective Studies
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 16, 2007; 99(10): 801 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. C. Greenwood, J. K. Ransley, M. S. Gilthorpe, and J. E. Cade
Use of Itemized Till Receipts to Adjust for Correlated Dietary Measurement Error
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2006; 164(10): 1012 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
H.-M. KIM, Y. YASUI, and I. BURSTYN
Attenuation in Risk Estimates in Logistic and Cox Proportional-Hazards Models due to Group-Based Exposure Assessment Strategy
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2006; 50(6): 623 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. A. Smith-Warner, D. Spiegelman, J. Ritz, D. Albanes, W. L. Beeson, L. Bernstein, F. Berrino, P. A. van den Brandt, J. E. Buring, E. Cho, et al.
Methods for Pooling Results of Epidemiologic Studies: The Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 163(11): 1053 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Natarajan, S. W. Flatt, X. Sun, A. C. Gamst, J. M. Major, C. L. Rock, W. Al-Delaimy, C. A. Thomson, V. A. Newman, J. P. Pierce, et al.
Validity and Systematic Error in Measuring Carotenoid Consumption with Dietary Self-report Instruments
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2006; 163(8): 770 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. Sturmer, S. Schneeweiss, J. Avorn, and R. J. Glynn
Adjusting Effect Estimates for Unmeasured Confounding with Validation Data using Propensity Score Calibration
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2005; 162(3): 279 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. Spiegelman
Commentary: Correlated errors and energy adjustment--where are the data?
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2004; 33(6): 1387 - 1388.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. B. Michels, S. A. Bingham, R. Luben, A. A. Welch, and N. E. Day
The Effect of Correlated Measurement Error in Multivariate Models of Diet
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2004; 160(1): 59 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
G. E Fraser
A search for truth in dietary epidemiology
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 521S - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. A. Thomson, A. Giuliano, C. L. Rock, C. K. Ritenbaugh, S. W. Flatt, S. Faerber, V. Newman, B. Caan, E. Graver, V. Hartz, et al.
Measuring Dietary Change in a Diet Intervention Trial: Comparing Food Frequency Questionnaire and Dietary Recalls
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2003; 157(8): 754 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. R. Marshall
Methodologic and Statistical Considerations Regarding Use of Biomarkers of Nutritional Exposure in Epidemiology
J. Nutr., March 1, 2003; 133(3): 881S - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. Rosner and R. Gore
Measurement Error Correction in Nutritional Epidemiology based on Individual Foods, with Application to the Relation of Diet to Breast Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2001; 154(9): 827 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
G. E. Fraser and D. O. Stram
Regression Calibration in Studies with Correlated Variables Measured with Error
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2001; 154(9): 836 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. L. Daniels, A. F. Olshan, K. Teschke, I. Hertz-Picciotto, D. A. Savitz, and J. Blatt
Comparison of Assessment Methods for Pesticide Exposure in a Case-Control Interview Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2001; 153(12): 1227 - 1232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
W. Willett
Commentary: Dietary diaries versus food frequency questionnaires--a case of undigestible data
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2001; 30(2): 317 - 319.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Liu, J. E Manson, M. J Stampfer, M. D Holmes, F. B Hu, S. E Hankinson, and W. C Willett
Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2001; 73(3): 560 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
V. Kipnis, D. Midthune, L. S. Freedman, S. Bingham, A. Schatzkin, A. Subar, and R. J. Carroll
Empirical Evidence of Correlated Biases in Dietary Assessment Instruments and Its Implications
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2001; 153(4): 394 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
D. Thurigen, D. Spiegelman, M. Blettner, C. Heuer, and H. Brenner
Measurement error correction using validation data: a review of methods and their applicability in case-control studies
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, October 1, 2000; 9(5): 447 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
N. J. Wareham, M.-Y. Wong, and N. E. Day
Glucose Intolerance and Physical Inactivity: The Relative Importance of Low Habitual Energy Expenditure and Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2000; 152(2): 132 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. R. Marshall
{beta}-Carotene: a Miss for Epidemiology
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 1999; 91(24): 2068 - 2069.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. E. Martínez, J. R. Marshall, E. Graver, R. C. Whitacre, K. Woolf, C. Ritenbaugh, and D. S. Alberts
Reliability and Validity of a Self-Administered Food Frequency Questionnaire in a Chemoprevention Trial of Adenoma Recurrence
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 1999; 8(10): 941 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. R Marshall and Z. Chen
Diet and health risk: risk patterns and disease-specific associations
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 1999; 69 (6): 1351S - 1356S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.