Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hook, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Regal, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hook, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Regal, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 145, No. 12: 1138-1144
Copyright © 1997 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Validity of Methods for Model Selection, Weighting for Model Uncertainty, and Small Sample Adjustment in Capture-Recapture Estimation

Emest B. Hook1,2, and Ronald R. Regal3

1School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, CA
2Department of Pediatrics, University of California School of Medicine San Francisco, CA
3Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Minnesota-Duluth Duluth, MN

Correspondence to: Professor Emest B. Hook, School of Public Health, Warren Hall (M.C. 7360), University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360.

In log-linear capture-recapture approaches to population size, the method of model selection may have a major effect upon the estimate. In addition, the estimate may also be very sensitive if certain cells are null or very sparse, even with the use of multiple sources. The authors evaluated 1) various approaches to the issue of model uncertainty and 2) a small sample correction for three or more sources recently proposed by Hook and Regal. The authors compared the estimates derived using 1) three different information criteria that included Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and two alternative formulations of the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), one proposed by Draper ("two pi") and one by Schwarz ("not two pi"); 2) two related methods of weighting estimates associated with models; 3) the independent model; and 4) the saturated model, with the known totals in 20 different populations studied by five separate groups of investigators. For each method, we also compared the estimate derived with or without the proposed small sample correction. At least in these data sets, the use of AIC appeared on balance to be preferable. The BIC formulation suggested by Draper appeared slightly preferable to that suggested by Schwarz. Adjustment for model uncertainty appears to improve results slightly. The proposed small sample correction appeared to diminish relative log bias but only when sparse cells were present. Otherwise, its use tended to increase relative log bias. Use of the saturated model (with or without the small sample correction) appears to be optimal if the associated interval is not uselessly large, and if one can plausibly exclude an all-source interaction. All other approaches led to an estimate that was too low by about one standard deviation. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 145: 1138–44.

Bayes theorem; bias (epidemiology); log-linear models; sample size


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
G. Hay, M. Gannon, J. MacDougall, C. Eastwood, K. Williams, and T. Millar
Capture--recapture and anchored prevalence estimation of injecting drug users in England: national and regional estimates
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2009; 18(4): 323 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
L. Vaissade and S. Legleye
Capture-recapture estimates of the local prevalence of problem drug use in six French cities
Eur J Public Health, January 1, 2009; 19(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. J. Lee, K. Lindquist, M. R. Segal, and K. E. Covinsky
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Index for 4-Year Mortality in Older Adults
JAMA, February 15, 2006; 295(7): 801 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M. Hickman, V. Higgins, V. Hope, M. Bellis, K. Tilling, A. Walker, and J. Henry
Injecting drug use in Brighton, Liverpool, and London: best estimates of prevalence and coverage of public health indicators
J Epidemiol Community Health, September 1, 2004; 58(9): 766 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
R. M Cormack, Y.-F. Chang, and G. S Smith
Estimating deaths from industrial injury by capture-recapture: a cautionary tale
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2000; 29(6): 1053 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. B. Hook and R. R. Regal
Accuracy of Alternative Approaches to Capture-Recapture Estimates of Disease Frequency: Internal Validity Analysis of Data from Five Sources
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2000; 152(8): 771 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Gallay, V. Vaillant, P. Bouvet, P. Grimont, and J.-C. Desenclos
How Many Foodborne Outbreaks of Salmonella Infection Occurred in France in 1995? : Application of the Capture-Recapture Method to Three Surveillance Systems
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2000; 152(2): 171 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. Debrock, P.-M. Preux, D. Houinato, M. Druet-Cabanac, F. Kassa, C. Adjien, G. Avode, F. Denis, F. Boutros-Toni, and M. Dumas
Estimation of the prevalence of epilepsy in the Benin region of Zinvie using the capture-recapture method
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2000; 29(2): 330 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.