Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinberg, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Thacker, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steinberg, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Thacker, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 145, No. 10: 917-925
Copyright © 1997 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Comparison of Effect Estimates from a Meta-Analysis of Summary Data from Published Studies and from a Meta-Analysis Using Individual Patient Data for Ovarian Cancer Studies

K. K. Steinberg1,, S. J. Smith1, D. F. Stroup2, I. Olkin3, N. C. Lee4, G. D. Williamson2 and S. B. Thacker2

1National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
2Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
3Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
4National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

Reprint requests to Dr. Karen K. Steinberg, Molecular Biology Branch, MS F-24, Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30341–3724.

To determine the relative merits of two quantitative methods used to estimate the summary effects of observational studies, the authors compared two methods of meta-analysis. Each quantified the relation between oral contraceptive use and the risk for ovarian cancer. One analysis consisted of a meta-analysis using summary data from 11 published studies from the literature (MAL) in which the study was the unit of analysis, and the second consisted of a meta-analysis using individual patient data (MAP) in which the patient was the unit of analysis. The authors found excellent quantitative agreement between the summary effect estimates from the MAL and the MAP. The MAP permits analysis 1) among outcomes, exposures, and confounders not investigated in the original studies, 2) when the original effect measures differ among studies and cannot be converted to a common measure (e.g., slopes vs. correlation coefficients), and 3) when there is a paucity of studies. The MAL permits analysis 1) when resources are limited, 2) when time is limited, and 3) when original study data are not available or are available only from a biased sample of studies. In public health epidemiology, data from original studies are often accessible only to limited numbers of research groups and for only a few types of studies that have high public health priority. Consequently, few opportunities for pooled analysis exist. However, from a policy view, MAL will provide answers to many questions and will help in identifying questions for future investigation. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 145: 917–25.

cost and cost analysis; meta-analysis; regression analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
P. G. Bagos
Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/5G and 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphisms in polycystic ovary syndrome
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 15(1): 19 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. A. Smith-Warner, D. Spiegelman, J. Ritz, D. Albanes, W. L. Beeson, L. Bernstein, F. Berrino, P. A. van den Brandt, J. E. Buring, E. Cho, et al.
Methods for Pooling Results of Epidemiologic Studies: The Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 163(11): 1053 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
J. Sakamoto, C. Hamada, M. Rahman, S. Kodaira, K. Ito, H. Nakazato, Y. Ohashi, and M. Yasutomi
An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Adjuvant Therapy with Carmofur in Patients with Curatively Resected Colon Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2005; 35(9): 536 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. De Laurentiis, G. Arpino, E. Massarelli, A. Ruggiero, C. Carlomagno, F. Ciardiello, G. Tortora, D. D'Agostino, F. Caputo, G. Cancello, et al.
A Meta-Analysis on the Interaction between HER-2 Expression and Response to Endocrine Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4741 - 4748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M M Rovers, N Black, G G Browning, R Maw, G A Zielhuis, and M P Haggard
Grommets in otitis media with effusion: an individual patient data meta-analysis
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 480 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Little, M. J. Khoury, L. Bradley, M. Clyne, M. Gwinn, B. Lin, M.-L. Lindegren, and P. Yoon
The Human Genome Project Is Complete. How Do We Develop a Handle for the Pump?
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2003; 157(8): 667 - 673.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. P. A. Ioannidis, P. S. Rosenberg, J. J. Goedert, and T. R. O'Brien
Commentary: Meta-analysis of Individual Participants' Data in Genetic Epidemiology
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2002; 156(3): 204 - 210.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. L. Norris, J. Lau, S. J. Smith, C. H. Schmid, and M. M. Engelgau
Self-Management Education for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2002; 25(7): 1159 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
K. Dickersin
Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind?
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2002; 31(1): 6 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M Saez, A Figueiras, F Ballester, S Perez-Hoyos, R Ocana, and A Tobias
Comparing meta-analysis and ecological-longitudinal analysis in time-series studies. A case study of the effects of air pollution on mortality in three Spanish cities
J Epidemiol Community Health, June 1, 2001; 55(6): 423 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. F. Stroup, J. A. Berlin, S. C. Morton, I. Olkin, G. D. Williamson, D. Rennie, D. Moher, B. J. Becker, T. A. Sipe, S. B. Thacker, et al.
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting
JAMA, April 19, 2000; 283(15): 2008 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
C. C. Earle and G. A. Wells
An Assessment of Methods to Combine Published Survival Curves
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
I. E. Allen and I. Olkin
Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved
JAMA, August 18, 1999; 282(7): 634 - 635.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. J. DeRubeis, L. A. Gelfand, T. Z. Tang, and A. D. Simons
Medications Versus Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Severely Depressed Outpatients: Mega-Analysis of Four Randomized Comparisons
Am J Psychiatry, July 1, 1999; 156(7): 1007 - 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. G. Comuzzie and D. B. Allison
The Search for Human Obesity Genes
Science, May 29, 1998; 280(5368): 1374 - 1377.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.