Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (150)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jernigan, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Farr, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jernigan, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Farr, B. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 143, No. 5: 496-504
Copyright © 1996 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Effectiveness of Contact Isolation during a Hospital Outbreak of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

John A. Jernigan1, Maureen G. Titus1, Dieter H. M. Gröschel1, Sandra I. Getchell-White1 and Barry M. Farr1,

1University of Virginia Health Sciences Center Charlottesville, VA.

Reprint requests to Dr. Barry M. Farr, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Box 473, Charlottesville, VA 22908.

Contact isolation has been recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the prevention of nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), but there are few data which prospectively quantitate the effectiveness of contact isolation for this purpose. During an outbreak of MRSA in a neonatal intensive care unit between July 18, 1991 and January 30, 1992, weekly surveillance cultures were performed on all patients. Sixteen of 331 admissions became colonized with MRSA, and 3 (19%) developed infections: bacteremia, conjunctivitis, and dialysis catheter site infection. The isolates from all 16 patients were submitted to plasmid profile analysis and restriction enzyme analysis of whole cell DNA. All of the patients had identical chromosomal patterns and plasmid profiles, which differed from control isolates from other wards, indicating that the outbreak resulted from spread of a unique strain. None of 144 personnel who were cultured after recent contact with newly colonized patients during the outbreak were found to carry MRSA, which suggests that patients were the reservoir for transmission rather than caregivers. The most probable source for each individual transmission was determined based on proximity in time and space and shared exposure to caregivers. The rate of transmission of MRSA from patients on contact isolation was significantly lower (0.009 transmissions per day on isolation) than the rate for patients not on isolation (0.140 transmissions per day unisolated, relative risk = 15.6, 95% confidence interval 5.3–45.6, p < 0.0001). The authors conclude that the risk of nosocomial transmission of MRSA was reduced 16-fold by contact isolation during the outbreak in this neonatal intensive care unit. These data confirm the results of previous studies which have suggested that contact isolation was effective in controlling the epidemic spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Epidemiol1996;143:496–504.

cross infection; infection control; intensive care units; neonatal; methicillin resistance; Staphylococcus aureus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. L. Gregory, E. C. Eichenwald, and K. M. Puopolo
Seven-Year Experience With a Surveillance Program to Reduce Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Pediatrics, May 1, 2009; 123(5): e790 - e796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
B. L. Johnston and E. Bryce
Hospital infection control strategies for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 17, 2009; 180(6): 627 - 631.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. S. Cooper, G. F. Medley, S. J. Bradley, and G. M. Scott
An Augmented Data Method for the Analysis of Nosocomial Infection Data
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2008; 168(5): 548 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
R. S. Evans, C. J. Wallace, J. F. Lloyd, C. W. Taylor, R. H. Abouzelof, S. Sumner, K. V. Johnson, A. Wuthrich, S. Harbarth, M. H. Samore, et al.
Rapid Identification of Hospitalized Patients at High Risk for MRSA Carriage
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 506 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. Robicsek, J. L. Beaumont, S. M. Paule, D. M. Hacek, R. B. Thomson Jr., K. L. Kaul, P. King, and L. R. Peterson
Universal Surveillance for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 Affiliated Hospitals
Ann Intern Med, March 18, 2008; 148(6): 409 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
A. N. Kho, L. Lemmon, M. Commiskey, S. J. Wilson, and C. J. McDonald
Use of a Regional Health Information Exchange to Detect Crossover of Patients with MRSA between Urban Hospitals
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2008; 15(2): 212 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. J. van Hal, D. Stark, B. Lockwood, D. Marriott, and J. Harkness
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Detection: Comparison of Two Molecular Methods (IDI-MRSA PCR Assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR Assay) with Three Selective MRSA Agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for Use with Infection-Control Swabs
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2007; 45(8): 2486 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BiostatisticsHome page
M. Forrester, A. Pettitt, and G. Gibson
Bayesian inference of hospital-acquired infectious diseases and control measures given imperfect surveillance data
Biostat., April 1, 2007; 8(2): 383 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Rosenthal, D. White, S. Churilla, S. Brodie, and K. C. Katz
Optimal Surveillance Culture Sites for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Newborns
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2006; 44(11): 4234 - 4236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. S. Huang, R. Datta, and R. Platt
Risk of acquiring antibiotic-resistant bacteria from prior room occupants.
Arch Intern Med, October 9, 2006; 166(18): 1945 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
E. J. Bishop, E. A. Grabsch, S. A. Ballard, B. Mayall, S. Xie, R. Martin, and M. L. Grayson
Concurrent Analysis of Nose and Groin Swab Specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR Assay Is Comparable to Analysis by Individual-Specimen PCR and Routine Culture Assays for Detection of Colonization by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2006; 44(8): 2904 - 2908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. M. Boyce, N. L. Havill, and B. Maria
Frequency and Possible Infection Control Implications of Gastrointestinal Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2005; 43(12): 5992 - 5995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. V. Giannoudis, J. Parker, and M. H. Wilcox
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in trauma and orthopaedic practice
J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2005; 87-B(6): 749 - 754.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
D. K. Warren, R. S. Liao, L. R. Merz, M. Eveland, and W. M. Dunne Jr.
Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Nasal Swab Specimens by a Real-Time PCR Assay
J. Clin. Microbiol., December 1, 2004; 42(12): 5578 - 5581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
V. Tomic, P. Svetina Sorli, D. Trinkaus, J. Sorli, A. F. Widmer, and A. Trampuz
Comprehensive Strategy to Prevent Nosocomial Spread of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Highly Endemic Setting
Arch Intern Med, October 11, 2004; 164(18): 2038 - 2043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
B S Cooper, S P Stone, C C Kibbler, B D Cookson, J A Roberts, G F Medley, G Duckworth, R Lai, and S Ebrahim
Isolation measures in the hospital management of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): systematic review of the literature
BMJ, September 4, 2004; 329(7465): 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
D. Flayhart, C. Lema, A. Borek, and K. C. Carroll
Comparison of the BBL CHROMagar Staph aureus Agar Medium to Conventional Media for Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in Respiratory Samples
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2004; 42(8): 3566 - 3569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
D Isaacs, S Fraser, G Hogg, and H Y Li
Staphylococcus aureus infections in Australasian neonatal nurseries
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2004; 89(4): F331 - F335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
P C Ng, H L Wong, D J Lyon, K W So, F Liu, R K Y Lam, E Wong, A F B Cheng, and T F Fok
Combined use of alcohol hand rub and gloves reduces the incidence of late onset infection in very low birthweight infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2004; 89(4): F336 - F340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
L. Saiman and J. Siegel
Infection Control in Cystic Fibrosis
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2004; 17(1): 57 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
K. Singh, P. J. Gavin, T. Vescio, R. B. Thomson Jr., R. B. Deddish, A. Fisher, G. A. Noskin, and L. R. Peterson
Microbiologic Surveillance Using Nasal Cultures Alone Is Sufficient for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Neonates
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2003; 41(6): 2755 - 2757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J.-C. Lucet, S. Chevret, I. Durand-Zaleski, C. Chastang, B. Regnier, and for the Multicenter Study Group
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Admission to the Intensive Care Unit: Results of a Multicenter Study
Arch Intern Med, January 27, 2003; 163(2): 181 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A S Haddadin, S A Fappiano, and P A Lipsett
Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit
Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2002; 78(921): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. M. Farr
Mupirocin to Prevent S. aureus Infections
N. Engl. J. Med., June 13, 2002; 346(24): 1905 - 1906.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
M. Carrier, R. Marchand, P. Auger, Y. Hebert, M. Pellerin, L. P. Perrault, R. Cartier, D. Bouchard, N. Poirier, and P. Page
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a cardiac surgical unit
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2002; 123(1): 40 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. H. Kollef and V. J. Fraser
Antibiotic Resistance in the Intensive Care Unit
Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2001; 134(4): 298 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. Chaix, I. Durand-Zaleski, C. Alberti, and C. Brun-Buisson
Control of Endemic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Cost-Benefit Analysis in an Intensive Care Unit
JAMA, November 10, 1999; 282(18): 1745 - 1751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
S. Ladhani, C. L. Joannou, D. P. Lochrie, R. W. Evans, and S. M. Poston
Clinical, Microbial, and Biochemical Aspects of the Exfoliative Toxins Causing Staphylococcal Scalded-Skin Syndrome
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 1999; 12(2): 224 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.