American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 143, No. 3: 293-300
Copyright © 1996 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
research-article |
Combined Analysis of Matched and Unmatched Case-Control Studies: Comparison of Risk Estimates from Different Studies
1Servel d'Epidemiologia i Registre de Cancer, Institut Oncológic Dunn i Reynals, Ciutat Sanitária i Universitária de Bellvitge, Autovia de Castelldefels km 2.7, L'Hospitalet del LL 08907 Barcelona, Spain
2Laboratori de Bioestadística i Epidemiologia, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain
3Unit of Field and Intervention Studies, International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon cedex 08, France
The authors propose a method to perform a combined analysis of matched and unmatched case-control studies that is based on an adaptation of logistic regression and can be performed using standard software. This methodology can be used to do pooled analyses of studies with different designs. Likelihood ratio tests can be performed to assess association, heterogeneity, or trend. The standard errors of the coefficients allow the derivation of a Wald test and the calculation of confidence intervals. Another application is to compare relative risk estimators for the same risk factors studied in different phases of a disease in an effort to explore factors that may be more important in one phase than in another. Interaction terms of risk factors with variables that code the different pooled studies can be used for this purpose. The advantage of using this method is that a formal statistical comparison can be performed in which the regression coefficients of the interaction terms estimate the relative differences in risk (odds ratio ratios) between the studies. This estimation can be adjusted for other confounder factors. Two examples of application using data from case-control studies on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer are presented to illustrate the use of this epidemiologic method.
epidemiologic methods; interaction; matching; regression analysis; retrospective studies; risk assessment; statistics
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. A. Morris, J. J. Marsh, P. G. Chiles, M. M. Magana, N.-C. Liang, X. Soler, D. J. DeSantis, D. Ngo, and V. L. Woods Jr High prevalence of dysfibrinogenemia among patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Blood, August 27, 2009; 114(9): 1929 - 1936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. l. Cessie, N. Nagelkerke, F. R. Rosendaal, K. J. van Stralen, E. R. Pomp, and H. C. van Houwelingen Combining Matched and Unmatched Control Groups in Case-Control Studies Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2008; 168(10): 1204 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. E. Meier, C.-A. Emmons, A. Litke, S. Wallenstein, and R. S. Morrison Characteristics of Patients Requesting and Receiving Physician-Assisted Death Arch Intern Med, July 14, 2003; 163(13): 1537 - 1542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Schwartz, D. B. Petitti, D. S. Siscovick, W. T. Longstreth Jr, S. Sidney, T. E. Raghunathan, C. P. Quesenberry Jr, and J. Kelaghan Stroke and Use of Low-Dose Oral Contraceptives in Young Women : A Pooled Analysis of Two US Studies Stroke, November 1, 1998; 29(11): 2277 - 2284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Sidney, D. S. Siscovick, D. B. Petitti, S. M. Schwartz, C. P. Quesenberry, B. M. Psaty, T. E. Raghunathan, J. Kelaghan, and T. D. Koepsell Myocardial Infarction and Use of Low-Dose Oral Contraceptives : A Pooled Analysis of 2 US Studies Circulation, September 15, 1998; 98(11): 1058 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|