Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spiers, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Guntheroth, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spiers, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Guntheroth, W. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 143, No. 11: 1137-1141
Copyright © 1996 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Negative Effect of a Short Interpregnancy Interval on Birth Weight following Loss of an Infant to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Philip S. Spiers1, Lynn Onstad2 and Warren G. Guntheroth1

1Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA
2The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA

It was hypothesized that a short interpregnancy interval immediately following the birth of an infant that had succumbed to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) (and no other cause of death) would be associated with a reduced mean birth weight in the next infant. Mothers who had given birth to two children in the state of Oregon between 1975 and 1984 and whose first child had died in infancy from either SIDS (n = 84) or some other cause (n = 305) were identified from vital records. A multiple regression analysis in which adjustment was made for possible confounding variables (including the birth weight of the deceased child) was conducted. When the firstborn child had succumbed to SIDS, the mean birth weight of the next baby was 314 g (2, 978 g vs. 3, 292 g, p = 0.04) lower when the interpregnancy interval was less than 6 months versus greater than 6 months. In contrast, a less-than-6-month interval had a slightly positive effect (60 g) on the mean birth weight of the next baby when the firstborn child had died due to a cause other than SIDS. These results suggest that parents who have lost a child to SIDS may wish to delay a new pregnancy for at least 6 months. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 1137–41.

birth intervals; birth weight; sudden infant death


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.