Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yong, L.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Schairer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yong, L.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Schairer, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 143, No. 10: 985-995
Copyright © 1996 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Prospective Study of Relative Weight and Risk of Breast Cancer: The Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project Follow-up Study, 1979 to 1987–1989

Lee-Chen Yong1,, Charles C. Brown1, Arthur Schatzkin1 and Catherine Schairer2

1Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD
2Division of Cancer Etiology, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD

Reprint requests to Dr. Lee-Chen Yong, Cancer Prevention Studies Branch, DCPC, National Cancer Institute, EPN, Room 211, 6130 Executive Blvd., MSC 7326, Rockville, MD 20852.

Despite extensive research on obesity and breast cancer in recent decades, inconsistencies in the literature exist. The authors examined prospectively the relation between adult relative weight (weight (kg)/height (m)1.5) and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 54, 896 women aged 31–89 years who had previously participated in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project. During a mean follow-up period of 7 years, 226 of the premenopausal women and 1,198 of the postmenopausal women developed breast cancer. Analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression methods with age as the underlying time variable and adjusted for the effects of potential confounders. Among postmenopausal women, the risk of breast cancer increased with increasing relative weight (p < 0.05 for trend); relative risk for the highest compared with the lowest quintile for relative weight was 1.3 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.1–1.6). This association was modified by age at diagnosis, with relative risks of 1.1 (95% Cl 0.8–1.4), 1.2 (95% Cl 0.8–1.7), and 1.8 (95% Cl 1.3–2.5), respectively, for women aged <60, 60–64, and ≥65 years. The higher risk of breast cancer among the older and overweight women was largely confined to women whose weights were measured during the postmenopausal but not the premenopausal period. This risk pattern was observed among the naturally menopausal women, but was also apparent in the smaller group of women with bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy with one ovary retained. Among premenopausal women, adult relative weight was not associated with breast cancer risk. These findings suggest that the inconsistencies in the literature on obesity and breast cancer may be due in part to the differing age distributions of the populations studied. The authors conclude that prevention of obesity throughout adulthood, particularly after menopause, may help reduce breast cancer among older women.

age factors; body weight; breast neoplasms; obesity; prospective studies; relative weight


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. S. Tworoger, S. A. Missmer, R. L. Barbieri, W. C. Willett, G. A. Colditz, and S. E. Hankinson
Plasma Sex Hormone Concentrations and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer Among Women Using Postmenopausal Hormones
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 20, 2005; 97(8): 595 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. J. MacInnis, D. R. English, D. M. Gertig, J. L. Hopper, and G. G. Giles
Body Size and Composition and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2117 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. Sweeney, C. K. Blair, K. E. Anderson, D. Lazovich, and A. R. Folsom
Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Elderly Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2004; 160(9): 868 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. M. Vacek and B. M. Geller
A Prospective Study of Breast Cancer Risk Using Routine Mammographic Breast Density Measurements
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 715 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. A. van den Brandt, D. Spiegelman, S.-S. Yaun, H.-O. Adami, L. Beeson, A. R. Folsom, G. Fraser, R. A. Goldbohm, S. Graham, L. Kushi, et al.
Pooled Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies on Height, Weight, and Breast Cancer Risk
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2000; 152(6): 514 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Hilakivi-Clarke
Estrogens, BRCA1, and Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., September 1, 2000; 60(18): 4993 - 5001.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. K. Kant, A. Schatzkin, B. I. Graubard, and C. Schairer
A Prospective Study of Diet Quality and Mortality in Women
JAMA, April 26, 2000; 283(16): 2109 - 2115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. I Li, J. L Stanford, and J. R Daling
Anthropometric variables in relation to risk of breast cancer in middle-aged women
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2000; 29(2): 208 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.