Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (54)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hastrup, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hastrup, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 143, No. 10: 1069-1078
Copyright © 1996 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Mismeasurement and the Resonance of Strong Confounders: Uncorrelated Errors

James R. Marshall1, and Janice L. Hastrup2

1Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
2Department of Psychology and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

Reprint requests to Dr. James Marshall, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, 270 Farber Hall/3435 Main Street, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214–3000.

Greenland first documented (Am J Epidemiol 1980;112:564–9) that error in the measurement of a confounder could resonate—that it could bias estimates of other study variables, and that the bias could persist even with statistical adjustment for the confounder as measured. An important question is raised by this finding: can such bias be more than trivial within the bounds of realistic data configurations? The authors examine several situations involving dichotomous and continuous data in which a confounder and a null variable are measured with error, and they assess the extent of resultant bias in estimates of the effect of the null variable. They show that, with continuous variables, measurement error amounting to 40% of observed variance in the confounder could cause the observed impact of the null study variable to appear to alter risk by as much as 30%. Similarly, they show, with dichotomous independent variables, that 15% measurement error in the form of misclassification could lead the null study variable to appear to alter risk by as much as 50%. Such bias would result only from strong confounding. Measurement error would obscure the evidence that strong confounding is a likely problem. These results support the need for every epidemiologic inquiry to include evaluations of measurement error in each variable considered.

confounding factors—epidemiology; epidemiologic methods; measurement error; misclassification


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. R. Marshall
Keeping Our Eye on the Ball: The American Society of Preventive Oncology in 2009
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2009; 18(10): 2796 - 2802.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
K N Carter, T Blakely, S Collings, F I. Gunasekara, and K Richardson
What is the association between wealth and mental health?
J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2009; 63(3): 221 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Marshall
Invited Commentary: Fewell and Colleagues Fuel for Debate
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2007; 166(6): 656 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
Z. Fewell, G. Davey Smith, and J. A. C. Sterne
The Impact of Residual and Unmeasured Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: A Simulation Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2007; 166(6): 646 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M. P Fox, T. L Lash, and S. Greenland
A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2005; 34(6): 1370 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. R Marshall
Commentary: About that measurement problem
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2005; 34(6): 1376 - 1377.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
I. C. Arts and P. C. Hollman
Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiologic studies
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 317S - 325S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. Zhuo, A. H. Smith, and C. Steinmaus
Selenium and Lung Cancer: A Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneity in the Current Epidemiological Literature
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2004; 13(5): 771 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
D. A Bennett
Review of analytical methods for prospective cohort studies using time to event data: single studies and implications for meta-analysis
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, August 1, 2003; 12(4): 297 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. R. Marshall
Methodologic and Statistical Considerations Regarding Use of Biomarkers of Nutritional Exposure in Epidemiology
J. Nutr., March 1, 2003; 133(3): 881S - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. O. Stram, M. Huberman, and A. H. Wu
Is Residual Confounding a Reasonable Explanation for the Apparent Protective Effects of Beta-carotene Found in Epidemiologic Studies of Lung Cancer in Smokers?
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2002; 155(7): 622 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
L. Myer and C. Morroni
Implications of random measurement error in studies adjusting for sexual behaviours
Sex Transm Inf, August 1, 2001; 77(4): 302 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
K E Pickett and M Pearl
Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review
J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2001; 55(2): 111 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
K. Wisborg, U. Kesmodel, T. B. Henriksen, S. F. Olsen, and N. J. Secher
A prospective study of smoking during pregnancy and SIDS
Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2000; 83(3): 203 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. R. Marshall
{beta}-Carotene: a Miss for Epidemiology
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 15, 1999; 91(24): 2068 - 2069.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Z.-F. Zhang, H. Morgenstern, M. R. Spitz, D. P. Tashkin, G.-P. Yu, J. R. Marshall, T. C. Hsu, and S. P. Schantz
Marijuana Use and Increased Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 1999; 8(12): 1071 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. E. Martínez, J. R. Marshall, E. Graver, R. C. Whitacre, K. Woolf, C. Ritenbaugh, and D. S. Alberts
Reliability and Validity of a Self-Administered Food Frequency Questionnaire in a Chemoprevention Trial of Adenoma Recurrence
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 1999; 8(10): 941 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. R Marshall and Z. Chen
Diet and health risk: risk patterns and disease-specific associations
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 1999; 69 (6): 1351S - 1356S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
A. J. Thornton and P. N. Lee
Review : Parental Smoking and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: A Review of the Evidence
Indoor and Built Environment, March 1, 1998; 7(2): 87 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. Din-Dzietham and I. Hertz-Picciotto
Relationship of Education to the Racial Gap in Neonatal and Postneonatal Mortality
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 1997; 151(8): 787 - 792.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.