Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aaby, P.
Right arrow Articles by Simondon, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aaby, P.
Right arrow Articles by Simondon, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 143, No. 10: 1035-1041
Copyright © 1996 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

No Long-term Excess Mortality after Measles Infection: A Community Study from Senegal

Peter Aaby1,2,, Badara Samb1, Marc Andersen3 and Francois Simondon1

1Project Niakhar ORSTOM, Dakar, Senegal
2Epidemiology Research Unit, Danish Epidemiology Science Center, Statens Seruminstitut Copenhagen
3Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen Denmark

Reprint requests to Dr. Peter Aaby, Epidemiology Research Unit, Statens Seruminstitut, Artillerivej 5, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.

Because measles immunization has been found in all studies to reduce mortality with more than the share of deaths attributed to acute measles, the authors examined mortality after measles infection in a study in a rural area of Senegal that included 6,924 unimmunized children, of whom 1,118 developed measles. Age-adjusted post-measles mortality was similar to the mortality of unvaccinated, uninfected children (mortality ratio (MR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.80–1.35). When controlling for source of infection, mortality rate was significantly different for children who contracted measles from a person outside the home (index cases vs. unvaccinated, uninfected MR = 0.27, 95% Cl 0.09–0.85) and for children infected at home (secondary cases vs. unvaccinated, uninfected MR = 1.10, 95% Cl 0.80–1.51). Hence, secondary cases had markedly higher long-term mortality than did index cases (MR = 4.13, 95% Cl 1.26–13.58). These estimates were essentially unchanged when the effects of season, period, separation from mother, size of community, and size of compound were investigated using a multivariate Cox regression model. The authors conclude that measles infection was not associated with increased mortality after the acute phase of infection and that index cases had lower mortality than uninfected, unvaccinated children. The reduction in mortality after measles immunization can therefore not be explained by the prevention of post-measles mortality.

immunization; infection; measles


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. Aaby, H. Jensen, J. Gomes, M. Fernandes, and I. M. Lisse
The introduction of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine and child mortality in rural Guinea-Bissau: an observational study
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2004; 33(2): 374 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. Aaby, A. Bhuiya, L. Nahar, K. Knudsen, A. de Francisco, and M. Strong
The survival benefit of measles immunization may not be explained entirely by the prevention of measles disease: a community study from rural Bangladesh
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 32(1): 106 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
F. Shann
A little bit of measles does you good
BMJ, July 3, 1999; 319(7201): 4 - 5.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
S O Shaheen, P Aaby, A J Hall, D J P Barker, C B Heyes, A W Shiell, and A Goudiaby
Cell mediated immunity after measles in Guinea-Bissau: historical cohort study
BMJ, October 19, 1996; 313(7063): 969 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.