American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 142, No. 8: 813-819
Copyright © 1995 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
research-article |
Breast Mammographic Pattern: A Concatenation of Confounding and Breast Cancer Risk Factors
1Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM
2Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM
3Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM
4Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA
Reprint requests to Dr. Sue A. Bartow, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Hospital Center, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
A mammographic pattern of >25% radiodensity is associated with increased risk for breast cancer. Mammographic pattern is influenced by age, body weight, reproductive factors, and race/ethnicity. The interaction among these factors in predicting breast radiographic pattern, and their association with the presence of histologic markers of increased risk of breast cancer, is poorly defined. To elucidate the relations among epidemiologic, radiographic, and histologic markers of breast cancer risk, the authors studied these factors in an unselected forensic autopsy series, accumulated between 1978 and 1983, of 486 women aged 1598 years at death. Older age and/or postmenopausal status was the strongest predictor of radiolucent breast pattern. Obesity, defined as a Quetelet index (weight (kg)/height (m)2) of >25, and large breast size were also highly significant predictors of breast radiolucency. Factors related to parity were not significant predictors of breast parenchymal pattern. Native American race was an independent predictor of breast radiolucency in this population. A dense parenchymal pattern was associated with increased prevalence of marked cystic change and the presence of duct epithelial hyperplasia in women under age 35. The results support the association of breast radiodensity with ethnic/racial, reproductive, and histologic factors predictive of cancer risk. However, this association is overshadowed by the effects of obesity and aging or menopause.
body constitution; breast neoplasms; fibrocystic disease of breast; mammography; obesity; radiography; risk factors; women
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M Swegle and M. W Kelly Tibolone: A Unique Version of Hormone Replacement Therapy Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2004; 38(5): 874 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Gapstur, P. Lopez, L. A. Colangelo, J. Wolfman, L. Van Horn, and R. E. Hendrick Associations of Breast Cancer Risk Factors with Breast Density in Hispanic Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2003; 12(10): 1074 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Roubidoux, J. S. Kaur, K. A. Griffith, B. Stillwater, P. Novotny, and J. Sloan Relationship of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns to Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Smoking in Alaska Native Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2003; 12(10): 1081 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Roubidoux, J. S. Kaur, K. A. Griffith, J. Sloan, C. Wilson, P. Novotny, and M. Lobell Correlates of Mammogram Density in Southwestern Native-American Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2003; 12(6): 552 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Thomas, R. A. Carter, W. H. Bush Jr., R. M. Ray, J. L. Stanford, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Daling, K. Malone, and S. Davis Risk of Subsequent Breast Cancer in Relation to Characteristics of Screening Mammograms from Women Less Than 50 Years of Age Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2002; 11(6): 565 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Maskarinec, L. Meng, and G. Ursin Ethnic differences in mammographic densities Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2001; 30(5): 959 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-P. Guo, L. J. Martin, W. Hanna, D. Banerjee, N. Miller, E. Fishell, R. Khokha, and N. F. Boyd Growth Factors and Stromal Matrix Proteins Associated with Mammographic Densities Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2001; 10(3): 243 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Moorman, B. A. Jones, R. C. Millikan, I. J. Hall, and B. Newman Race, Anthropometric Factors, and Stage at Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2001; 153(3): 284 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. van Rijk and A. J. van Dongen Limited Angle, Limited Approach? J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2000; 41(11): 1859 - 1860. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, J. Barclay, E. A. Sickles, and V. Ernster Effect of Age, Breast Density, and Family History on the Sensitivity of First Screening Mammography JAMA, July 3, 1996; 276(1): 33 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||





