Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonsen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Schonberger, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simonsen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Schonberger, L. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 141, No. 11: 1089-1096
Copyright © 1995 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Multiple False Reactionse in Viral Antibody Screening Assays after Influenza Vaccination

Lone Simonsen1,, Joanna Buffington1, Craig N. Shapiro1, Robert C. Holman1, Tara W. Strine1, Brenda J. Grossman2, Alan E. Williams3 and Lawrence B. Schonberger1

1Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta GA
2American Red Cross, National Headquarters Washington DC.
3Jerome H. Holland Laboratory, National American Red Cross Rockville, MD.

Reprint requests to Dr. Lone Simonsen, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, MS A-32, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333.

In December 1991, US blood centers reported an unusual increase in donations that tested falsely reactive for antibodies to two or more (multiple false positive) of the following viruses: human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), human T-cell lymphotrophic virus type I (HTLV-I), and hepatitis C virus. Many of these donations were from people who had recently received the 1991-1992 influenza vaccine, raising the possibility that this vaccine had somehow specifically caused the problem of multiple false reactivity. A case-control study of 101 affected donors and 191 matched controls found that recent receipt of any brand of influenza vaccine was significantly associated with testing multiple false positive (p < 0.05), as was a history of recent acute illness (p < 0.05) and of allergies (p < 0.05). Surveillance for monthly rates of multiple reactive donations from May 1990 through December 1992 linked the seasonal cluster of multiple false-positive donations to the use of viral screening test kits thought to react nonspecifically to donor immunoglobulin M. There was no similar increasee in multiple false-positive donations during the 1992–1993 influenza vaccination season after the HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus tests were replaced; however, the number of donations that were falsely reactive for only HTLV-I almost doubled, indicating that false reactivity was not specifically associated with the 1991–1992 influenza vaccine. Retesting of affected donors found that the duration of HTLV-I and hepatitis C virus false reactivity was 3–6 months. The cluster of multiple false-positive donations in 1991 was most likely caused by the test kits used, rather than by the influenza vaccine. Am J Epidemiol 1995;141:1089–96.

blood donors; false positive reactions; HIV; HTLV-I; hepatitis C viruses; influenza vaccine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. P. Erickson, T. McNiff, and J. D. Klausner
Influenza vaccination and false positive HIV results.
N. Engl. J. Med., March 30, 2006; 354(13): 1422 - 1423.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.