Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morens, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Littman, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morens, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Littman, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 140, No. 7: 621-628
Copyright © 1994 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

"Thucydides Syndrome" Reconsidered: New Thoughts on the "Plague of Athens"

David M. Morens1, and Robert J. Littman2

1Department of Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, and Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Hawaii Honolulu, HI
2Department of European Languages and Literature, University of Hawaii Honolulu, HI

Reprint requests to Dr. David M. Morens, School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Biomedicine D103, 1960 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822

A recently published theory (N Engl J Med 1985;313:1027–30) argues that the famous Athenian epidemic of 430 B.C. was caused by a combination of influenza and toxin-producing staphylococci (the "Thucydides syndrome"). Although it is accepted by some medical authorities, and ostensibly supported by identification of modern cases, the theory's plausibility has not been carefully examined. The authors used an epidemiologic approach supplemented by historical and clinical observations to ex amine the likelihood that a "Thucydides syndrome" could have caused the Athenian epidemic. Arguing against the influenza theory are epidemiologic and clinical features of the disease, mathematical models of the spread of influenza, and empirical obser vations of epidemic influenza in premodern populations of known size and crowding. The authors conclude that neither influenza nor a "Thucydides syndrome" could have produced the Athenian epidemic. Epidemiologic features suggest either a zoonotic or vectorborne disease, a disease associated with an environmental source, or a respi ratory infection with unusual alternative mechanisms of spread.

epidemiology; history of medicine; influenza; shock; septic; Staphylococcus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.