Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krohn, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krohn, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 138, No. 5: 326-332
Copyright © 1993 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

The Bacterial Etiology of Conjunctivitis in Early Infancy

Marijane A. Krohn1,2, Sharon L. Hillier2, Thomas A. Bell1,3, Richard A. Kronmal4, J. Thomas Grayston1 and the Eye Prophylaxis Study Group

1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA
3Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA
4Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, WA

The authors conducted this study to determine the etiologic agents of conjunctivitis in early infancy. From 1985 to 1990, 630 infants enrolled in a randomized, controlled, double-masked study of eye prophylaxis were observed for 60 days after delivery for signs of conjunctivitis. The following isolates were categorized as pathogens: Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria cinerea, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Chlamydia trachomatis. Using conditional logistic regression for analysis of 97 infant pairs, the authors identified isolates categorized as pathogens almost exclusively among cases (odds ratio (OR) = 18.0, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 2.3–128). Among the microorganisms which have not usually been regarded as pathogens in the etiology of infant conjunctivitis, Streptococcus mitis was the only microorganism associated with an increased risk of conjunctivitis (OR = 5.3, 95% Cl 1.8–15.0). The findings concerning the species of bacteria most often associated with conjunctivitis, as well as the finding that method of delivery is unimportant, suggest that bacteria were transmitted to the infants' eyes after birth and not from the birth canal. Am J Epidemiol 1993; 138:326–32.

conjunctivitis; eye infections; infant; microbiology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
V Vedantham, S J Isenberg, and L Apt
Prophylaxis of ophthalmia neonatorum
Br J Ophthalmol, October 1, 2004; 88(10): 1352 - 1352.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
S. L. Block, J. Hedrick, R. Tyler, A. Smith, R. Findlay, E. Keegan, and D. W. Stroman
Increasing Bacterial Resistance in Pediatric Acute Conjunctivitis (1997-1998)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2000; 44(6): 1650 - 1654.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
S. O Sykes, C. Riemann, C. I Santos, D. M Meisler, C. Y Lowder, J. P Whitcher, and E. T Cunningham Jr
Haemophilus influenzae associated scleritis
Br J Ophthalmol, April 1, 1999; 83(4): 410 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. J. Isenberg, L. Apt, and M. Wood
A Controlled Trial of Povidone-Iodine as Prophylaxis against Ophthalmia Neonatorum
N. Engl. J. Med., March 2, 1995; 332(9): 562 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.