American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 138, No. 11: 1007-1015
Copyright © 1993 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
research-article |
Use of the Positive Predictive Value to Correct for Disease Misclassification in Epidemiologic Studies
1University of Ulm, Unit of Epidemiology Ulm, Germany
2University of Göttingen, Department of Medical Statistics Göttingen, Germany
Reprint requests to Dr. Hermann Brenner, University of Ulm, Unit of Epidemiology, Am Hochsträss 8, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
Misclassification problems of the disease status often arise in large epidemiologic cohort studies in which the outcome is classified on the basis of record linkage with routinely collected error-prone data sources, such as cancer registries or mortality statistics. If the misclassification is nondifferential, i.e., independent of the exposure status, this leads to bias toward the null in estimates of relative risk. A variety of methods have been proposed to correct for this bias. Most approaches are based on estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of disease classification from validation studies, which typically require invasive and time-consuming diagnostic procedures. For ethical and practical reasons, such procedures may often not be applied on individuals classified as not having the disease, in which case estimates of sensitivity and specificity cannot be obtained. In this paper, an alternative correction method is proposed based on estimates of the positive predictive value, which requires validation of the diagnosis among samples of individuals classified as having the disease only. The method is applicable in situations with either differential or nondifferential specificity of disease classification as long as the sensitivity is nondifferential. Point estimates and large-sample interval estimates of the corrected relative risk are algebraically derived. The performance of the method is assessed by extensive simulations and found to be satisfactory even for small sample sizes.5
bias (epidemiology); epidemiologic methods; follow-up studies; risk
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Pekkanen, J. Sunyer, J. M. Anto, P. Burney, and on behalf of the European Community Respiratory He Operational definitions of asthma in studies on its aetiology Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 28 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Corrao, A. Zambon, L. Bertu, E. Botteri, O. Leoni, and P. Contiero Lipid lowering drugs prescription and the risk of peripheral neuropathy: an exploratory case-control study using automated databases J Epidemiol Community Health, December 1, 2004; 58(12): 1047 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Devine The Impact of Ignoring Measurement Error when Estimating Sample Size for Epidemiologic Studies Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2003; 26(3): 315 - 339. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Blakely and C. Salmond Probabilistic record linkage and a method to calculate the positive predictive value Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2002; 31(6): 1246 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. G. Barr, J. Herbstman, F. E. Speizer, and C. A. Camargo Jr. Validation of Self-reported Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Cohort Study of Nurses Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2002; 155(10): 965 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. R. Sharpe, J. Siemiatycki, and M.-E. Parent Activities and Exposures during Leisure and Prostate Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2001; 10(8): 855 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. K. P. Egglin and A. R. Feinstein Context Bias: A Problem in Diagnostic Radiology JAMA, December 4, 1996; 276(21): 1752 - 1755. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. K Formann and T. Kohlmann Latent class analysis in medical research Statistical Methods in Medical Research, June 1, 1996; 5(2): 179 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|